The sudden and dramatic emergence of the self-styled Islamic State (IS) seemingly took the world by surprise when it quickly captured and ruthlessly subjugated broad areas of Iraq and Syria last year.
In truth, however, the rise of IS should have come as no surprise; its fundamentalist roots had taken hold in Iran 35 years before, when Ayatollah Khomeini usurped power after the popular revolution that overthrew the Shah.
As was the case in Tehran in 1979, IS’s current campaign is being waged by an anachronistic force that is engaged in a struggle for an alternative destiny to that which is aspired to by the majority of the modern Muslim world.
The phenomenon of fundamentalism, with all its associated savagery, neither rose accidentally nor expanded spontaneously.
It is only through the existence of a sponsoring regime in Iran that Islamic fundamentalism has been able to transform itself into a global threat.
The Qods Force, which was formed a quarter of a century ago by the Tehran regime’s Revolutionary Guard (IRGC), is Iran’s instrument for exporting fundamentalism.
Each of its nine corps has targeted a particular country or region.
Thus we see:
International sources estimate that Iran spends $1bn–$2bn every month to prop up the Syrian regime;
The Iranian mullahs’ regime, in essence, is the fountainhead of Islamic fundamentalism in terms of ideology, policy, money, weapons and logistical support.
Since 1979, it has provided a role model and inspired the growth of Islamist fundamentalism, both Shiite and Sunni, IS included.
Without that regime, there would be no intellectual, ideological, or political space, no dependable epicentre, for the emergence and growth of fundamentalist groups.
There is a baseless narrative that has been developed by those who favour appeasing the Iranian regime: that Sunni fundamentalism is somehow more dangerous than Shiite fundamentalism, and that the former can be defeated with the aid of the latter.
Therefore, goes the narrative, we must enlist the forces of Shiite fundamentalism, no matter the excesses that continue to be carried out in its name.
It is this narrative that informs the policy which has steered the world towards the current disaster, and risks the greater disaster of a nuclear-armed Iran.
It is true that Shiites and Sunnis have doctrinal differences; but today’s manifestations of fundamentalism, whether Shiite or Sunni, are in essence indistinguishable.
Both are characterised by misogyny and religious discrimination; both seek to impose belief through brutality; both rely on mediaeval law to justify the most inhumane forms of punishment; and both pursue the goal of a caliphate, which translates in practice into the cruellest of tyrannies.
To appease Tehran over its nuclear programme would ultimately be as perilous as to partner with it in the battle with IS.
The first would risk putting nuclear weapons in the hands of religious fundamentalists and hugely increase instability in the region.
The second, as Mrs Maryam Rajavi, the president of the opposition National Council of Resistance of Iran observed recently, would give looser rein to the Qods Force, making it an even more destructive weapon.
It is wholly naïve to believe that partnership with Iran in an attempt to stabilise the situation in Iraq, and thereby accord it international respectability, would somehow be an incentive for it to abandon its nuclear ambitions.
If the most pressing foreign policy objective today is to degrade and overcome fundamentalism, Western governments must begin with a realistic, hard-headed re-evaluation of their policy towards Iran.
They should not give succour to an oppressive, fundamentalist regime, nor should they provide it with legitimacy under the guise of diplomatic dialogue.
They should, rather, support the Iranian people and their aspiration for human rights, liberty, and rule of law.
That, ultimately, can only be brought about by democratic change, creating a new Iran, which, freed from theocratic rule, would ultimately be the best hope for stability in what is now a dangerously unstable region.
Iran Briefing | News Press Focus on Human Rights Violation by IRGC, Iran Human Rights
Jun 13, 2017 Comments Off on Iran: Military Budget Increased 145%
Jun 07, 2017 Comments Off on Corps and the electoral periods: Politics and Militarism
Jun 03, 2017 Comments Off on IS QATAR ALIGNING WITH IRAN?
May 27, 2017 Comments Off on IRGC: Dezful is Iran’s new ballistic missile
Jun 24, 2017 Comments Off on Iran’s Nuclear Chief Warns U.S. Against Tilting Power Balance In Middle East
Jun 21, 2017 Comments Off on U.N. Leader Softens His Predecessor’s Criticism of Iran Missile Tests
Jun 20, 2017 Comments Off on What’s the Future of Iran’s Military?
May 21, 2017 Comments Off on Student Imprisoned For Refusing to Collaborate With Iran’s Intelligence Ministry Denied Medical Care
Jun 24, 2017 Comments Off on Iran’s Nuclear Chief Warns U.S. Against Tilting Power Balance In Middle EastIran’s Nuclear Chief Warns U.S. Against Tilting Power Balance In Middle East Iran’s atomic energy chief Ali Akbar Salehi, who helped forge the 2015 nuclear agreement, warned the United States on June 23 against...
Jun 21, 2017 Comments Off on U.N. Leader Softens His Predecessor’s Criticism of Iran Missile TestsU.N. Leader Softens His Predecessor’s Criticism of Iran Missile Tests The United Nations secretary general appears to have softened his predecessor’s criticism of Iran last year over its missile tests, a volatile...
Jul 14, 2016 Comments Off on Corps’ one hundred thousand of triggered missiles in Lebanon:An official Israel-threatening by CorpsIran Briefing: Since August 7, 1979, when Ayatollah Khomeini declared the last Friday of Ramadhan as “Quds Day”, the Islamic Republic has always tried to hold an imposing ceremony by using state resources as well as requiring people’s involvement. This year’s Quds march had fundamental...