The implications of the scourge of sectarianism are far reaching for Iran too. As a constitutionally Shia Muslim state, Iran is mindful of the restricting framework of sectarianism. Since its inception, the Islamic Republic of Iran has been eager to project an image that transcends sectarian differences. This has been a key pillar of Iran’s regional policy. Speaking to the Muslim masses and voicing popular angst against the Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands, or against US arrogance and political domination of the international order, have been at the heart of Iran’s message to its neighbourhood. Of course, this has antagonised neighbouring regimes, which accuse Tehran of destabilising the region.
Saudi Arabia was quite vocal in protesting against Iran’s message following the 1979 revolution. But Tehran turned such criticism to its advantage. By supporting Hamas and Hezbollah in an apparent attempt to challenge Israel, which it calls the “Zionist entity”, by proxy it gained political credibility on the Arab street. Having Hamas in this alliance was very important, as it offered Iran an example of an inter-sectarian alliance against a common enemy.
The notion of the “axis of resistance” applied to the political congruity of Iran, Syria, Hezbollah and Hamas, was celebrated in Iran as a successful case of its trans-sectarian policy, emphasising the political unity of all Muslims. Iran clearly saw itself as the champion of all Muslims and with the sprouting Arab Spring, the Iranian leadership was self-congratulatory for providing a model for the Muslim world to follow, even though the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt appeared very reluctant to follow the Iranian model.
But the Arab Spring has now turned to winter and given rise to devastating carnage in Syria and Iraq. ISIS has galvanised the international community to act. The US-led aerial bombardment of ISIS assets have offered the Kurdish Peshmerga and the Iraqi forces some reprieve.
Ironically, the common threat of ISIS has put old foes on the same side of the fence. Iran and the US have an enemy in ISIS. So why is Iran not part of the international coalition?
The Iranian leadership operates in its own political and psychological sphere, and responds to a range of factors beyond the geo-strategic needs of the day. The parameters of this sphere dictate that Iran cannot afford to be seen as a minor player in a US-led operation. Iran sees itself as an equal player, and in many ways a more critical player because of its geographical location. While this does not rule out ad hoc contact between the two sides on practical issues, it does make entering into a military alliance with the US highly problematic for Iran’s sense of its own regional role.
The Iranian leadership is also suspicious of US intentions and sincerity in the fight against ISIS. The US is accused of sponsoring rebel groups in Syria, and having a hand in the emergence of what Iran calls “takfiris” (apostate groups). A recent statement by US Secretary of State John Kerry about the role of Saudi Arabia, UAE and Turkey in the rise of ISIS seemed to vindicate Iranian cynicism. Saudi Arabia is now part of the international coalition to stop the ISIS land grab. The Iranian authorities, especially the conservatives, see this as disingenuous. Indeed, Washington’s continued commitment to deposing Bashar al-Assad in Syria, which is at war with ISIS, is seen as evidence of its deceit.
Instead, Iran sees its ties with the central government in Baghdad and the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) as leverage in the push against ISIS. Iranian authorities celebrate what they see as Tehran’s immediate response to aid Iraq against ISIS, and have published images of General Qasem Soleimani, the Commander of Quds Forces, in Kurdistan.
From Iran’s point of view, history is on its side: Once all is said and done, once US troops return home, Iran maintains the most battle-ready military force to offset regional challenges, buttressed with strong political ties with Iraq, Syria and Hezbollah. The Iranian leadership remains confident that this alliance will allow Tehran to shift the focus back on Israel, and allow Iran to reclaim its role as regional leader.
A version of this article was first published by Al-Jazeera
Nov 20, 2018 Comments Off on US set to accuse Iran of violating chemical weapons treaty
Nov 20, 2018 Comments Off on House GOP Needs a Steady Foreign Policy Hand
Nov 19, 2018 Comments Off on Massive sanctions will end Iran’s belligerence
Nov 19, 2018 Comments Off on Like it or Not, Regime Change is Coming to Iran
Nov 20, 2018 Comments Off on Saudi King Calls on Int’l Community to Stop Iran’s Nuclear Missile Programme
Nov 19, 2018 Comments Off on Will Re-Ignited U.S. Sanctions on Iran Drive the Country to Cryptocurrency?
Nov 19, 2018 Comments Off on Iran must be punished for failing to comply with financial standards
Nov 16, 2018 Comments Off on Iran sanctions reimposed and in full effect
Nov 13, 2018 Comments Off on U.S. Sanctions Against Iran Might Not Prove Important To Oil MarketsU.S. Sanctions Against Iran Might Not Prove Important To Oil Markets U.S. Sanctions Against Iran Might Not Prove Important To Oil Markets So, U.S. sanctions on Iran were fully implemented on Monday, fully but not...
Nov 09, 2018 Comments Off on CAN SANCTIONS BRING REGIME CHANGE IN IRAN?CAN SANCTIONS BRING REGIME CHANGEIN IRAN? CAN SANCTIONS BRING REGIME CHANGEIN IRAN? On November 5, the United States imposed a comprehensive set of sanctions on Iran, which were characterized by United States...
Jul 14, 2016 Comments Off on Corps’ one hundred thousand of triggered missiles in Lebanon:An official Israel-threatening by CorpsIran Briefing: Since August 7, 1979, when Ayatollah Khomeini declared the last Friday of Ramadhan as “Quds Day”, the Islamic Republic has always tried to hold an imposing ceremony by using state resources as well as requiring people’s involvement. This year’s Quds march had fundamental...