Mark Zuckerberg Rules Out Trump Fact-Checks, Says Facebook ‘Shouldn’t Be the Arbiter of Truth’

Don’t expect Facebook to join Twitter in fact-checking false or inaccurate statements made by Donald Trump. In an interview set to air Thursday, CEO Mark Zuckerberg told Fox News “I just believe strongly that Facebook shouldn’t be the arbiter of truth of everything that people say online.”

 

Mark Zuckerberg Rules Out Trump Fact-Checks, Says Facebook ‘Shouldn’t Be the Arbiter of Truth’
Mark Zuckerberg Rules Out Trump Fact-Checks, Says Facebook ‘Shouldn’t Be the Arbiter of Truth’

 

But Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey pushed back against Zuckerberg’s comments, saying Wednesday night that Twitter will “continue to point out incorrect or disputed information about elections globally.”

On Tuesday, Twitter took the unprecedented step of adding a fact check link to the bottom of several tweets in which Donald Trump falsely claimed that mail-in voting is linked to fraud. The text, “Get the facts about mail-in ballots,” redirected users to a Twitter page linking to explanations that that Trump’s claims are not supported by any evidence.

Zuckerberg told Fox News he disagrees with that decision. “We have a different policy than, I think, Twitter on this,” he said in the interview. “I just believe strongly that Facebook shouldn’t be the arbiter of truth of everything that people say online. Private companies probably shouldn’t be, especially these platform companies, shouldn’t be in the position of doing that.”

Several hours after Zuckerberg’s comments were made public, Dorsey responded. “Fact check: there is someone ultimately accountable for our actions as a company, and that’s me,” Dorsey tweeted Wednesday night. “Please leave our employees out of this. We’ll continue to point out incorrect or disputed information about elections globally. And we will admit to and own any mistakes we make.”

“This does not make us an ‘arbiter of truth,’” he continued. “Our intention is to connect the dots of conflicting statements and show the information in dispute so people can judge for themselves. More transparency from us is critical so folks can clearly see the why behind our actions.” Read more

 

Latest news
Related news