Home Blog Page 448

Health of Acting President of Defenders of Human Rights Center deteriorates

0

Human rights activists are reporting deterioration in the health of Narges Mohammadi, Deputy Head of Iran’s Defenders of Human Rights Center (DHRC), who is imprisoned in Zanjan. Due to her extremely poor physical condition, Mohammadi fell, severely injuring her face and was transferred to a hospital. Despite doctors’ demands to hospitalize her for continued medical treatment, Mohammadi was returned to prison. In a meeting with her family this past Saturday, her family members expressed sorrow and concern over her condition after she contracted a serious nerve disorder due to her imprisonment.

Source: Iran Daily Brief

Kurdish prisoner sentenced

Fouad Ahmadinejad, a member of the Kurdish minority, was sentenced to six months in prison by a Revolutionary Court on charges of propaganda against the regime and collaborating with an opposition party.

 Source: Iran Daily Brief

Abu Zubaydah and Iran

0

Thomas Joscelyn

At the Washington Free Beacon, Bill Gertz has a piece about Jose Rodriguez, the former chief of the CIA’s Counterterrorism Center. Rodriguez warns that the CIA is “out of the business” of interrogating senior al Qaeda terrorists and this will eventually lead to a hole in America’s counterterrorism efforts, if it hasn’t already. Time will tell if Rodriguez is right. The Obama administration is betting that he isn’t, and that by killing select al Qaeda leaders in drone strikes the terrorist threat is fully neutralized. There are significant problems with the Obama administration’s approach, even absent the prickly debate over interrogations.

Putting that debate to the side, there are interesting nuggets in Rodriguez’s recent book, Hard Measures, concerning top al Qaeda operative Abu Zubaydah’s ties to Iran.

Zubaydah was the first detainee subjected to so-called enhanced interrogation techniques in 2002. Attorneys for Zubaydah and others have endorsed a story, told by Zubaydah himself during his tribunal session at Guantanamo, that he wasn’t really a senior al Qaeda operative. Rodriguez blasts this argument, and rightfully so.

Zubaydah had a wealth of knowledge about al Qaeda’s inner-workings, including details about Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s role in masterminding the 9/11 attacks. There is no way Zubaydah could have known such things without being allowed into Osama bin Laden’s inner sanctum. In addition, a mountain of evidence ties Zubaydah to al Qaeda’s operations and international plotting well before the 9/11 attacks. (I have previously debunked the canard about Zubaydah not being a senior al Qaeda leader on several occasions. See, for example, here, here, and here.)

In March 2002, the CIA and others were closing in on Zubaydah. They had narrowed the search to sixteen locations in Pakistan – a somewhat daunting range of possible hideouts. Rodriguez explains (emphasis added):

Working with our Pakistani partners, we decided to raid all sixteen sites simultaneously. With the recent influx of FBI special agents, we now had enough U.S. assets to have people at each target site along with the Pakistanis. The decision to go after all the sites at once was unusual but if we had worked through them one by one, [Zubaydah] would likely have found out that we were closing in on him and fled the area entirely. There were reports that Abu Zubaydah planned to relocate to Iran, so time was of the essence.

Other ties between Zubaydah and Iran can be found in declassified and leaked documents. But, to my knowledge, reports of Zubaydah himself planning to relocate to Iran in 2002 were not previously available to the public.

In addition, Rodriguez reports (emphasis added):

Among the material found at the time of Abu Zubaydah’s capture were videotapes he had prepared in advance to celebrate another yet-to-happen al Qaeda success. The tapes were designed to rally supporters and solicit funds from backers of their evil jihad. At least one of them suggested that Abu Zubaydah had been to Iran or was somehow cooperating with the Iranians. Surely Abu Zubaydah would not have gone to the trouble of making these tapes unless they had some very specific and sizable plans in mind. But what were those plans?

Zubaydah’s attorneys recently pressed the U.S. government to try him before a military commission. By all means, if Zubaydah is eventually tried, his videotapes and other documents should be used against him. Even better, these materials should be declassified and released to the public, so we can see them for ourselves. We can then see what Zubaydah had to say about Iran, too.

Rodriguez’s revelations about Zubaydah’s ties to Iran, including his putative plan to move there, are not surprising. Zubaydah helped other top al Qaeda operatives and associates relocate to Iran after the 9/11 attacks.

A one-page biography of Zubaydah prepared by the U.S. government reads: “In November 2001, Abu Zubaydah helped smuggle now-deceased al Qaeda in Iraq leader Abu Musab al Zarqawi and some 70 Arab fighters out of Kandahar, Afghanistan, into Iran.”

Zarqawi will always be remembered for his vehement hatred of Shiites. The Iranians did not imprison him, however, but instead allowed him to make his way onto Iraq, bringing mayhem and chaos with him. There is evidence that Zarqawi coordinated his network’s activities from Iranian soil for a time.

Ali Saleh Husain, an al Qaeda operative who worked with Zubaydah, also helped relocate al Qaeda operatives and their family members to Iran in late 2001. In January 2009, the Treasury Department reported: “In 2001 after the fall of the Taliban, Husain facilitated the move of al Qaeda-associated fighters, including an al Qaeda military commander, from Afghanistan to Iran. After leaving Afghanistan, Husain was responsible for smuggling al Qaeda members and associates via networks in Zahedan, Iran.”

In 2003, after terrorist attacks in Riyadh and elsewhere were traced to al Qaeda’s network in Iran, Husain and other senior al Qaeda operatives were placed under house arrest. Zahedan, which sits on Iran’s border with Afghanistan and Pakistan, remained a hotbed for al Qaeda activity even after Husain was detained, however.

Another example can be found in the story of Guantanamo detainee Bensayah Belkacem. According to a leaked Joint Task Force Guantanamo (JTF-GTMO) memo, Belkacem was Zubaydah’s contact in Bosnia. Belkacem was a member of the controversial group known as the “Algerian Six,” a group of Algerians who had relocated to Bosnia and were linked to extremist activity. The other members of the group had their habeas petitions granted by a DC district court, but Belkacem had his petition for a writ of habeas corpus denied.

JTF-GTMO officials found that Belkacem “applied for an Iranian visa on 1 October 2001 in Sarajevo intending to travel to Afghanistan through Iran and then assist the other Algerians [sic] jihadist elements in Afghanistan in anticipation of the US campaign following the 11 September 2001 attacks.”

Iran clearly provided a hospitable operating environment for Zubaydah and his colleagues. It is no wonder that Zubaydah himself, per Rodriguez’s testimony, may have planned to move there.

Some of have seized on the tensions between Iran and al Qaeda that arose later, after the Iranians did not release some al Qaeda members from house arrest in a timely manner. Those tensions, reflected in a narrow set of Osama bin Laden’s documents released to the public, were very real, but they do not define the entire relationship. Iran and al Qaeda cooperated both before and since.

Nearly all of the materials in the U.S. government’s possession pertaining to Iran’s ties to al Qaeda, including Zubaydah’s videos, should be declassified and released to the public.

  Source: Defend Democracy

Iran plans to build 10 new destroyers

The deputy commander of the Iranian Navy has announced that Iran plans to build 10 new domestically designed destroyers.

In an interview with the Persian service of the Fars News Agency published on Tuesday, Rear Admiral Abbas Zamini said that the Navy has planned to design and manufacture 10 new destroyers in addition to the Jamaran and Velayat destroyers. He added that the plan envisaged manufacturing seven destroyers of the Sina class, which were capable of firing missiles, and three destroyers of the Mowj class.

Iran’s first domestically manufactured destroyer, the Jamaran, was launched in February 2010.

The warship can carry helicopters and is equipped with torpedoes and electronic radar. It is 94 meters long and weighs over 1,500 tons.

The destroyer is capable of engaging in surface, air, and undersea warfare.

In September 2011, Navy Commander Habibollah Sayyari announced that the second domestically manufactured destroyer would join the country’s naval fleet in the near future.

Rear Admiral Sayyari said that the Jamaran II (Velayat) was highly advanced and differed greatly from the Jamaran.

Zamini also said that about 70 percent of the project to build the Velayat destroyer had been completed and expressed hope that the destroyer would be launched during the current Iranian calendar year, which started on March 20.

Source: Payvand

Five Arab minority political prisoners sentenced to death in Karoon Prison

0

Human rights activists expressed concern that the five had been secretly executed. The five prisoners are Abdolrahman Heydari, The Heydari, Jamshid Heydari, Mansour Heydari and Amir Moavi. The reports further reveal that Karoon Prison was placed on special alert and internal security forces were positioned around the prison, imposing unprecedented restrictions on political prisoners, cutting off telephone lines and discontinuing meetings. Heavy pressure was applied on the families of prisoners to not give media interviews. The five prisoners, including three brothers, a cousin and another individual, were arrested during Iranian Arab protests that took place last year in Ahvaz and sentenced to death on charges of killing security forces personnel, a charge that was vehemently denied by all five. Amnesty International called on the immediate stay of the executions.

Source: Iran Daily Brief

Imprisoned journalist not released at end of sentence

0

Isa Saharkhiz was not released despite having served his prison sentence. The son of the imprisoned journalist published the following on his Facebook page: Although the arrest and sentence was not legal, according to the illegal sentence, my father should have been released from prison yesterday. He is still being held in the hospital as a hostage.

Source: Iran daily Brief

Yet Another Group Blamed for the Assassination of Scientists

0

A month after the hanging of Majid Jamali Fashi (on May 15), the person an Iranian court sentenced to be hanged on charges of assassinating nuclear scientist Massoud Ali-Mohammadi who had been killed in January 2010, Iran’s ministry of intelligence announced through a statement that it had arrested another three individuals related to the assassination of the country nuclear scientists.

According to the statement, this group is part of a larger group of “mercenary intelligence and terrorist officers” who have been arrested as a result of “monitoring Israeli data and operational bases.” The ministry said more information on the arrest would be provided as soon as security considerations are processed.

The detainee is said to be involved in the assassination of Majid Shahriari, Mostafa Ahmadi Rowshan and Reza Ghashghai. Other than Ghashgai, the other two were nuclear scientists who had been killed in the assassinations of the last two years.

A number of Iranian nuclear scientists, or individuals affiliated with the country’s nuclear program, have been killed by unidentified individuals. Iranian officials have tied these assassinations to Israel and the West. Some Western media accuse Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency to be behind these assassinations and have written that the agency had benefited from the assistance of the Mojahedin Khalq Organization (MKO).

Massoud Ali Mohammadi, Mostafa Ahmadi Rowshan, Majid Shahriari, and Dariush Rezai are said to be among the victims. Fereidun Abbasi, the current head of Iran’s nuclear agency is another person on whom an assassination attempt was made, but he survived the attack.

Mostafa Ahmadi Rowshan was the business deputy of the Natanz nuclear enrichment facility who on was killed because of an explosion in Tehran on January 11 this year. Reza Ghashghai who was with him was also killed.

Massoud Ali-Mohammadi, a university professor at Tehran University was killed by an explosion in front of his house in January 2010.

Majid Shahriari was a physics professor at Shahid Beheshti University who was killed when a magnetic bomb that was attached to his car exploded. On the same day, another physics professor Fereidun Abbasi Davani survived a separate assassination attempt.

After these killings, some Iranian media claimed that the death of Ardeshir Hosseinpour in 2007 was part of the same scheme to assassinate the country’s nuclear scientists. Iran’s semi official Fars news agency quoted international media that he was a researcher in Iran’s nuclear program and a designer of the centrifuges.

Massoud Ali Mohammadi was the first person who after being killed was announced to be part of Iran’s nuclear program. A few months after his assassination, Iranian officials announced that Majid Jamali Fashi was the person behind the killing. The national radio and television broadcast his comments that were said to be his confessions, something that was questioned and viewed with suspicion by independent sources and while ambiguities and questions remained about his involvement in the murders, officials announced that he was hanged. In his televised remarks, Fashi said that he had planned to kill five others and that he had been trained for this in Israel. An Israeli newspaper had written at that time that Fashi was a supporter of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad during the presidential elections and had been a member of the Revolutionary Guards.

But questions about his involvement continued even after his death. Among these were his passport which was used by officials and pro-state media to claim that he had Israeli affiliations. It turned out that the passport was forged and that the ministry of intelligence had Photoshoped a passport that it had obtained from the Intranet.

With this latest claim by the ministry of intelligence about finding the assassin of the killings, doubts about Fashi’s role in the incidents have resurfaced and the ministry of intelligence has said that it will stop until all those Zionist criminals responsible for the crimes are punished.

Source: Roozonline

Still no information on condition of five Christian converts arrested 130 days ago

130 days after the arrest of five Christian converts by security forces and plainclothes police in Shiraz, their condition is still unknown. The five are imprisoned in Adelabad Prison in Shiraz and have not been charged. The five are Ms. Fariba Nazemian and Mr. Homayou, Mojtaba Hosseini, Mohammad Reza Partoei, Shokouhi and Vahid Hakani.

  Source: Iran Daily Brief

Iran moving closer to acquiring nuclear arms

From the Parchin nuclear reactor to obtaining plutonium, Iran is moving closer and closer to producing nuclear weapons. In Parchin Iran has conducted a process simulating the detonation of a nuclear bomb. On 25 May, satellite pictures showed the demolition of two buildings at the scene, leaving nothing but the trails of the bulldozers that cleared the buildings. Since the disclosure of these images Iran has proceeded to deny all this, most recently last Monday when the Iranian Defense Minister Brigadier General Ahmad Vahidi said that allegations that Iran was trying to erase evidence at the Parchin military base are “irrelevant and unwise”. This follows the previous clean-up process at the same site last April, in line with the “sterilization” operations which the regime set out on in Lavizan-Shian in 2004, where secret nuclear research was conducted at the center for physics research.

These activities raised suspicions about Iran’s military nuclear activities and ultimately led exposed this. This also led to some international pressure on Iran with regards to the Parchin site.

On the other hand, there are limits to the extent to which Iran can prevent international inspectors’ access, regardless of the statements that have been issued from Tehran. Iran’s most recent accusations are that the inspectors are “Western spies” whilst in reality Parchin is at the heart of the current conflict, whilst other issues that raise concern regarding Iran’s race to obtain nuclear weapons are also coming to the surface. These issues are complicated by Iran returning to its long-term strategy of stalling, avoiding confrontation and trying to exploit the differences in international players’ stances, taking advantage of talks about the nuclear file until all such talks are exhausted.

Over recent months, the Iranian regime has directly violated all international demands by installing new centrifuges at the Fordow underground facility, near the city of Qom. This has allowed Iran to produce 20-percent enriched uranium faster than ever before. In December 2011, Iran had the capacity to produce approximately 50kg of 20-percent enriched uranium in Qom. However, a few months later in May 2012, this figure had trebled to 150kg in the city of Qom alone. Iran is also producing enriched uranium in the Natanz reactor.

Moreover, instead of freezing this high level of enrichment, as is the international demand, and ceasing all activities in Qom – the site that Iran has tried to keep secret from the entire world – the Iranian regime is not only speeding up its uranium enrichment but it is working to build a facility to contain the gas expelled during nuclear enrichment, in addition to those currently operating in Qom and Natanz. The possibility of a third enrichment station was discussed in a recent report by the Institute for Science and International Security [4 June, 2012]. Thus, if Iran succeeds in its attempts, it will have three uranium-enrichment stations in operation.

It is well known that moving from 20-percent enrichment to 90- percent enrichment (the average required for manufacturing weapons of mass destruction) takes less time and effort than reaching 20-percent enrichment. Therefore, it is no exaggeration to say that there are countries that view Iran – in light of this development – as an existing and future danger. It is noticeable that the pretexts provided by Iran to embark on increasing the level of its uranium-enrichment – to levels required for nuclear weapons – have been mocked by nuclear experts, in the same manner as Iran’s recent statements claiming that International Atomic Energy Agency [IAEA] experts are “western agents”, and therefore should not be allowed to access Iran’s nuclear facilities. Iran, for example, claims that it requires nuclear fuel rods to produce medical radionuclide. According to a nuclear exert, this is incorrect because “Iran was successful in collecting 140 kg of 20-percent enriched uranium, an amount sufficient to operate several research reactors in Tehran for years.” He added that Iran’s claims that it requires greater-enriched uranium for future use cannot be trusted, and it is clear that this represents a blow to the forthcoming round of diplomatic negotiations, whilst it also represents a slap in the face to the efforts that have been exerted by IAEA Secretary-General Yukiya Amano.

In fact, Iran prepared an additional enrichment base within Qum facility with pre-prepared empty castings ready for the installation of a centrifugal pump, in a measure seen as a challenge to the international community’s demands. The nuclear expert also stressed that Iran is doubling its enrichment capabilities and that the observers who are keeping a watchful eye on the statements issued by the Iranian regime are quite certain of this. In June 2011, Dr. Fereydoon Abbasi-Davani announced that the Islamic Republic of Iran intends to triple its 20-percent uranium enrichment in Qom, and this is precisely what happened.

There is another field in which Iran is blatantly violating all its international commitments. Secretly, Tehran is seeking to obtain platinum as an alternative in the production of nuclear weapons. Late last year, one of the systematic crime gang within the “Commonwealth of Independent States” – including Azerbaijan, Armenia, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Ukraine – managed to secretly contact an Iranian agent with the purpose of selling plutonium at the price of $2 million per kilogram. Iran requires only 6 kilograms of plutonium for a nuclear weapon, although a nuclear expert claimed that a nuclear bomb could be manufactured with even less.

This Iranian expert is well-known in the arena of nuclear proliferation and he has close connections all across Eastern Europe, Russia and Turkey. According to the same source, samples were sent to Iran for testing. Perhaps, the Iranian middleman is working directly or indirectly with the Iranian state. Yet, without a doubt, if this agent managed to acquire military-grade plutonium, this would no doubt end up in the hands of Iranian officials, whether we are talking about political officials or the mullahs.

The Iranian regime’s long history in utilizing unofficial channels to import fusion weapons material (uranium and plutonium) in order to save time would certainly allow the Iranians to purchase plutonium independently, even without the use of middlemen. In light of all these developments, it is no longer odd that the US envoy to the IAEA expressed his disappointment at the failure of the recent negotiations between the Iranians and the IAEA which aimed to end the state of diplomatic inaction on this issue. Years pass, and Iran continues to violate its international commitments, hiding behind a fatwa issued by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in which he pledged not to allow the production of nuclear weapons. Therefore, Iran seems to be trying to fool the IAEA in order to prevent its observers from doing their jobs. It is ironic that the forthcoming round of negotiation will be held in Moscow, a country that sees Iran, Syria and North Korea as members of its axis. Therefore, it is not clear now whether Iran is ready to look for a solution to the prolonged nuclear crisis or not, given that the European intends to impose sanctions banning Iranian oil experts beginning from next month.

Source: Freedom Messenger

Confrontations between Petroleum University students in Ahvaz and University IRGC forces

0

Last month there were reported confrontations between students and the Culture and Society Division and University IRGC forces arrived following the cancellation of the graduation ceremony due to violation of the Islamic dress code and opposition to music at the university. Following the cancellation of the ceremony by the Culture and Society Division, about two hundred students held a protest on the university campus and suspended their studies. Following the protest, several of the students were summoned to the disciplinary committee, and there were reports of violent confrontations between the students and university IRGC forces. According to the latest reports, the university president decided to postpone final exams, threatening the protesting students with a disciplinary hearing.

  Source: Iran Daily Brief