Home Blog Page 449

IRGC files suit against MP

0

A top commander of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) announced that the IRGC has filed a complaint against Ali Motahari, the Member of Parliament who has accused them of interfering in the elections.

Masood Jazaeri, the deputy head of IRGC public relations, told ISNA: “A suit has been filed against the individual that has attributed lies to the IRGC, and the court will deal with such people.”

Ali Motahari, a Tehran representative in Parliament, gave a speech in May in which he accused the Revolutionary Guards of interfering with the elections for the ninth parliament. He said: “The involvement of the Revolutionary Guards was obvious at many stations, and many candidates back this statement.”

These unprecedented statements by a conservative member of Parliament have drawn fierce fire from the IRGC, which according to Iran’s constitution must keep its hands off elections and avoid political partisanship.

It is not clear whether Ali Motahari’s MP status would grant him immunity from prosecution.

Motahari has been defiant in his accusations against the IRGC, saying an MP has the right to express an opinion about the affairs of the country, and no government institution should be made exempt from criticism.

Motahari’s statement about IRGC involvement in the elections has been echoed by other Members of Parliament. Former Semnan representative Mostafa Kavakebian announced that he has proof of such interference and he demanded an official probe into the handling of the parliamentary elections.

The parliamentary elections were boycotted by many groups, including the reformists, in protest against the closed political arena and an alleged lack of transparency in the election process.

Source: Radio Zamaneh

Two Acts of a Coup

Bahram Rafiei

The Revolutionary Guards Before and After 2009

“Any action to launch a velvet revolution in Iran will be crushed immediately. If political groups and parties in Iran are realistic they will not move towards planning or implementing such scenarios. Everybody must accept the people’s votes and respect them. Iranian people are Muslims and want Islam and they view the Imam’s line and that of the supreme leader to be the pure path of Mohammad’s Islam and will never deviate from this course.”

These are the final remarks of General Yadoolah Javani, the former head of the political office of the Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) to a reporter of Sobh Sadegh weekly, the official newspaper of the IRGC just 4 days prior to the elections for the 10th president of Iran in June of 2009. The general was speaking to a reporter from the publication that he oversaw.

In that interview, Javani accused reformers who supported Mir-Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karoubi of taking steps to “silently overthrow” the regime and stressed that “some reform groups, and particularly the extreme ones, believed that they had to win the presidential elections and come to power through any means. They believe that if they did not return to power, they would remain in the periphery for a long time, perhaps even never return to power.”

The head of the IRGC political office made these remarks at a time when the internal bulletin of the force known as Tahlile Rooz (The Analysis of the Day) was telling its political messengers, who had been sent across the country just before the elections, that Mousavi was winning over Ahmadinejad in most provinces and added that the green color that Mousavi’s supporters had chosen indicated the launching of the velvet revolution. Javani had also warned that the green clothing, scarf, hat, wristband, windshield wipers and antennas that people demonstrated during the 2009 presidential campaign as a sign of solidarity with Mir-Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karoubi were more than just ways to create public enthusiasm.

These are words that other IRGC commanders repeated and maneuvered around during the two weeks leading up to the June 12, 2009 elections. These are also the very words that were alarming to three presidential candidates of the time who viewed them as interference of the military in the elections.

Just one day prior to the elections, Mousavi wrote a 4-paragraph letter to ayatollah Khamenei, the supreme leader of the Islamic regime, in which he wrote that he had received “evidence about the interference of a number of commanders and authorities of the IRGC and the Basij mobilization force in the elections.” He also said that such “interference was not only a violation of the law, but also created division among commanders, officials and the healthy and sincere body of the Basij and the IRGC. Since the extent of such unlawful measures are not known and since some of the staff and observers in the voting precincts are from amongst supporters of specific candidates, it is concerning that people’s votes may be hijacked.”

Ayatollah Khamenei’s response to this letter was a meaningful silence. The election day came and voting took place on June 12. Reports on the number of votes cast to the candidates were broadcast on national radio and television from the ministry of the interior and events took the turn that ayatollah Khamenei had announced in August/September of 2008 when he had met with Ahmadinejad’s cabinet. At that particular meeting a year before the presidential elections and three years into Ahmadinejad’s administration, the leader told the cabinet, “Work as if you have another 5 years to work; In other words assume that you will be the manager for this year plus the following 4 years.”

Demonstrations broke out across Iran and Mousavi issued his first statement and addressing the Iranian nation wrote, “The results that have been announced for the tenth presidential elections are baffling. People who had stayed in long lines to cast their vote were witness to the mix of the voters and know who they have voted to. They look in absolute amazement at the games played by the officials and the national radio and television. More than ever before, they now want to know how and by whom and which officials were the plans for these games made. While strongly protesting these current events and the blatant and gross violations on election day, I warn that I will not surrender to this dangerous set up.”

Two days after the elections, as security, police and para-military forces increasingly battled protestors, Mousavi issued another statement in which he stressed that “Those who after many violations had announced the incredible results of the presidential elections were now striving to finalize those results and start a new period in the country. I have repeatedly spoken of the dangers of unlawful acts during the course of the campaign and elections and have stressed that such measures could result in dictatorship and despotism, and that our nation today can sense this.”

Protests did not die but grew, particularly in Tehran. From the early hours of June 14, IRGC and Basij forces took positions to tackle the protestors. The first nightly attack took place at Tehran University. A number of student sources, including the country’s largest student organization Daftare Tahkim Vahdat said there were a number of deaths which officials denied.

The big march came on June 15 when people poured into the streets of the capital to show their rejection of the announced results of the elections. Clashes erupted and a large number of protestors were killed by the IRGC.

In an interview with state controlled Kayhan newspaper, Abdollah Araghi, the current vice commander of IRGC’s ground forces and the then commander of the Tehran’s Mohammad Rasool Allah force confirmed the crackdown of demonstrators by the IRGC, and said, “The IRGC and the Basij was responsible for the security of the capital between June 15, 2012 and August 16, 2012.” In the interview he also stressed that he personally had given the orders to “directly shoot” at the protestors to his forces through his wireless network.

As demonstrations expanded, IRGC and Basij forces throughout the country battled with protestors and the number of deaths grew, as many civil, political and media activists were arrested and rounded up.

In his fifth statement since the elections, Mousavi wrote, “As I watch the situation, I see a larger purpose in these events than just the imposition of an undesired government on the people. They want to impose a new political life on the country.”

The Second Act of the Coup

In October of 2009, during a “Clerics Countrywide Seminar in the city of Mashhad” a commander Moshafagh accused personalities such as Hashemi Rafsanjani, Mohammad Khatami, Mohammad Mousavi Khoeniha and Mir-Hossein Mousavi and reform parties such as the Majmae Rohaniyun Mobarez (Association of Combatant Clerics), Majmae Niruhaye Khate Imam (Association of Forces of the Imam’s Path), Mosharekat (Islamic Iran Participation Front), Mojahedin Enghelab (Organization of the Mujahedin of the Islamic Revolution), Kargozaran (Executives of Construction), Hambasteghi (Islamic Coalition Party), and Mardomsalari (Democracy Front) of planning to overthrow the Islamic republic and striving to subjugate ayatollah Khamenei. He stressed, “With this knowledge, we disrupted their (the reformers) efforts and stopped them.”

In his remarks, he also said that Ahmadinejad was ayatollah Khamenei’s presidential candidate of choice and revealed the creation of a board months before the day of elections to identify and confront the “sedition.”

Prior to him the top IRGC commander Mohammad Ali Jaafari had also made similar remarks in August\September 2009. Soon after Moshafagh’s remarks, the head of the IRGC political office Yadollah Javani confirmed the views of the senior IRGC security commander and called them “enlightening.”

The Iran Participation Front, a leading reformist party in Iran whose leadership and many members were arrested in 2009, many of whom remain behind bars till this day, wrote an open letter to the head of Iran’s judiciary and pointing to the remarks of this IRGC security commander as proof of the views of the protestors that an “electoral coup” had taken place by military services under the leadership of the country’s supreme leader.

“The widely published speech of general Moshafagh, a senior commander in the Saralah base, exposed the plans for an electoral coup during the 10th presidential elections which confirms the claims of the leaders of the Green Movement in that the elections were engineered,” Mosharekat’s letter to the head of the judiciary Sadegh Larijani said. It asked the judiciary to investigate this issue as it clarified that not only was a fraud perpetrated during the elections, but a whole process had been engineered to hijack the election prior to the event.

The judiciary did not respond to the party’s letter and request. Instead, the judiciary re-summoned 7 of the leaders of the party to return to prison because of the party’s claims in the letter.

In January 2011 Mohammad Hossein Safar Herandi, the current advisor to the IRGC commander and former state controlled Kayhan newspaper said, “During last year’s sedition which had foreign connections, three thousand individuals had been identified and their work is complete.” He also said that “100 of the principal organizers of the sedition who had been criminals had been sentenced, thus uprooting the whole issue.”

A year later, he confirmed the killing of protestors in addition to the arrest of demonstrators and leaders of the Green Movement by security-military forces as an effort to retake control of the protests and said, “Right from the beginning of the sedition some believed that by arresting a few the issue will be resolved, which was a simplistic perspective because not much depended on the statements of these two (Mousavi and Karoubi) and the whole issue was not under their control.”

In March of 2011, Kayhan newspaper published the speech of Hossein Salami, the vice commander of the IRGC to IRGC and Basij personnel in the northern town of Babol and quoted him as saying, “Domestic seditions had been crushed through a connection with the velayate faghih” (the clerical leader).

These remarks were followed by house arrests of the Green Movement leaders, Mehdi Karoubi, Mir-Hossein Mousavi and Zahra Rahnavard. In his talk, Salami implicitly also confirmed the defeat of the efforts to crush the protest and the Green Movement.

A year after his remarks that were dubbed as “bitter reality,” he again confirmed the failure of the IRGC to crush the revolt and said, “The names of seditionists can be announced but those of its creators cannot. Some ask why Mousavi and Karoubi not put up for trial. The reason is that they have supporters whose names I cannot announce.”

And so on the third anniversary of the 2009 electoral coup, the headaches of IRGC commanders who implemented their coup project continues. Just recently, the official publication of the IRGC was forced to retract the remarks of the head of the force’s think tank who had at one time said, “The ashes of the sedition are still hot.”

Source: Roozonline

European Parliament condemns Iran’s violation of minorities’ rights

0

The European Parliament has condemned Iran’s “current disrespect of minority rights” and urged the authorities in Tehran to allow minorities “to exercise all rights granted by the Iranian Constitution and international law.”

Following a recent report by Amnesty International condemning the pending execution of five members of Iran’s Ahwazi Arab minority, the EU parliament called on Iran to eliminate “all forms of discrimination based on religious or ethnic grounds or against persons belonging to minorities, such as Arabs, Bahaí’is, Azeri, Baluchi, Kurds and Turkmen.”

A copy of the EU resolution called on “the Iranian authorities to ensure that the arrested members of Iran´s Ahwazi Arab minority – Mohammad Ali Amouri, Rahman Asakereh, Hashem Shaabni Amouri, Hadi Rashidi, Sayed Jaber Alboshoka and Sayed Mokhtar Alboshoka are tried according to international fair trial standards and without recourse to the death penalty.”

The five Ahwazi men were arrested last year during the demonstrations and were charged of killing a security and intelligence officer and wounding another. They were sentenced to death on March 15.

The Iranian constitution formally provides for the fair treatment of ethnic minorities, including their rights to use their language, but in practice ethnic groups, such as Azeris, Arabs, Kurds and Balochs are reportedly discriminated against, especially in political rights and freedom of expression.

The EU parliament urged the Iranian government to uphold “the equal treatment and non-discrimination provisions contained in the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran in all spheres of public life and services, and to protect the freedoms of ethnic minorities to freely associate and express themselves.”

But the violations of human and civil rights of persons belonging to ethnic minorities, according to the EU resolution “must be seen within the broader context of widespread human rights violations in Iran.”

In a previous interview with Al Arabiya, Kazem Mojaddam, member of the Center against Anti-Arab Racism in Iran, said, “The government of Iran does not allow the Ahwazi people to practice their cultural activities although the Iranian constitution gives this right to all the people of Iran.”

Mojaddam added that the Ahwazi people were being threatened by the Iranian government, “which tries to undermine the Arab identity and culture through imprisonment and killing of Arab artists and writers.”

“The government also does not allow Arab-speaking Iranians to name their children after non-Shiite Arab names,” Mojaddam added.

Khuzestan is the source of 90 percent of Iran’s oil production, but people in the province complain of marginalization, poverty and the lack of adequate social services.

Besides, the province often takes the lion’s share of executions in the country. In 2007, Iranian authorities executed 22 activists in Ahwaz after they were accused to supporting the secession of the region from Iran.

Source: Al Arabiya

Environmental activists sentenced

An Iranian court sentenced 37 environmental activists working on behalf of Lake Urmia to a cumulative total of 18 years in prison and 1,110 lashes. Each individual was sentenced to six months imprisonment and 30 lashes.

  Source: Iran Daily Brief

Journalist transferred to prison in humiliation with hands and feet in shackles

According to reports, imprisoned journalist Bahman Ahamadi Amouee, who was exiled to Rajaï Shahr Prison from Evin Prison, was transferred in a humiliating manner by security forces, with his hands and legs shackled. He was not allowed to collect his personal effects. Amoui was first transferred to solitary confinement along with several other political prisoners who tried to conduct a ceremony marking the death of Hoda Saber in prison. Evin Prison guards cut off electricity in the political prisoners wing and prevented the ceremony from taking place. The report further revealed that calls of Death to the Dictator were heard throughout the wing.

 Source: Iran Daily Brief

Syria linked to Iran sanction breaches

0

An independent panel of experts has informed the UN Security Council that Syria is involved in nearly all breaches of UN sanctions against Iran. UN experts have reportedly gathered “substantial evidence” regarding Syria’s role in arms transfers with Iran. Reports indicate that the UN sanctions panel on Iran prepared a report which outlined three illegal arms shipments, two of which involve Syria. This report is expected to be published in the near future.

During a UN Security Council meeting on the Iran sanctions, US Deputy Permanent Representative to the UN, Rosemary DiCarlo, said “over the last two years, the panel has assembled substantial evidence proving Syria’s role as a repeat violator of UN sanctions on Iran” adding “Syria’s refusal to implement its UN obligations should be a matter of central concern to this council.”

For his part, French Permanent Representative to the UN, Martin Briens, stressed that “Syria, which brutally represses its people, is implicated in most of the cases of violations of the arms embargo notified to the committee.”

He added “the scope confirms the existence of a deliberate and continued policy of illicit transfers of arms and connected materials between Iran and Syria.”

France’s Permanent Representative to the UN also claimed that “Syria is also implicated in numerous cases notified to the North Korea sanctions committee” stressing “these are grave violations by the country.”

The US and its western allies are calling for tighter sanctions on Iran over its on-going nuclear ambitions which Tehran claims are peaceful but which Washington and others believes represents an attempt to develop a nuclear bomb.

An independent panel of experts recommended that the UN Security Council’s Iran sanctions committee add two Iranian companies to a UN blacklist for violating the UN ban on arms exports by Tehran.

This recommendation to sanction Iran’s “Yas Air” and “SAD Import-Exports” was included in a confidential report issued by the UN panel of expert. UN Security Council diplomats revealed that this report will be published in the near future.

This report claims that Syria remains the top destination for Iranian arms shipments in violation of the UN Security Council ban on weapons exports by the Islamic Republic of Iran.

For his part, Britain’s Deputy Permanent Representative to the UN, Philip Parham, told the UN Security Council that London supports the panel’s recommendation of sanctioning the two Iranian firms.

Speaking during a meeting on the UN’s sanctions committee for Iran, Parham said “Iran continues flagrantly to violate this council’s resolutions” adding “we support the two clear designation proposals, Yas Air and SAD Import/Exports, for their respective roles in illegal Iran arms exports.”

It was not clear when the Iran sanctions committee would make a decision on whether to add Yas Air and SAD Import/Exports to the list of companies facing an international asset freeze and banishment from international business.

  Source: Asharq Alawsat

Human rights lawyer to serve 13-year sentence

0

Iranian human rights lawyer and activist Abdolfattah Soltani has been sentenced to 13 years in jail by a Tehran Revolutionary Court.

Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA) reports that Soltani’s 13 year sentence was confirmed at the branch 54 of the Revolutionary Court and will have to be served in exile.

Maede Soltani, who resides in Germany, told AP that the sentence was “politically motivated” and that her father was told that his sentence would be reduced “if he were to apologize and speak out against Ms. Ebadi [Iranian Nobel Peace laureate Shirin Ebadi] in an open letter or an interview.”

Abdolfattah Soltani, like Ebadi, is one of the co-founders of the Defenders of Human Rights Centre (DHRC) in Iran, an NGO providing pro bono legal services in human rights cases. The centre is currently outlawed in Iran, and its members are all targets of continuous persecution.

Soltani will be exiled to the remote city of Borazjan to serve out his sentence, making it hard for his family to visit him.

Soltani;s charges included “propanada against the regime, founding the Defenders of Human Rights  Centre, and assembly and collusion against national security.” He is also charged with “collecting pelf” for receiving the Nuremberg Human Rights award in 2009.

Soltani’s arrest and sentencing have been condemned by Amnesty International, which has called for his immediate release.

Source: Radio Zamaneh

Mr. Khamenei, You Are Responsible, You Must Respond

Arash Bahmani

On the third anniversary of Iran’s disputed presidential election of 2009, the imprisoned member of the Hezbe Mosharekat (Participation Party) and the Sazemane Mojahedin Enghelab Eslami (Revolutionary Mojahedin of the Islamic Revolution) seyed Mostafa Tajzadeh has written yet another letter to the supreme leader of the Islamic regime in which he holds the ayatollah responsible for the events that shook the country after the 2009 presidential vote and asks him to be accountable and to respond to those protests.

Tajzadeh writes that his purpose in writing the letter – an unusually bold undertaking in the Islamic republic especially if written from inside the prison where Tajzadeh is still being held – was to “raise the issues (that exist in the country) in simple and clear terms.” Tajzadeh stresses on the correctness of the views of his co-thinkers regarding the “electoral coup” of 2009 and presents his questions to ayatollah Khamenei under seven headings.

Tajzadeh was the deputy minister of the interior under Mohammad Khatami’s first reformist government in the 1980s. Here are the excerpts of the letter.

“Official speakers and propagandists know better than you and I that their presentation of events and the problem, which revolve primarily around the official claim that protestors wanted to topple the regime and that they were or are affiliated to foreign intelligence agencies, have no basis. Even if these propagandists are not part of this scheme, they would have had no choice but to defend these claims. If they did not accuse the protestors of striving to overthrow the regime and having links with foreigners how could they justify the blood that was shed, the human considerations and principles that were trampled on, and the damage that was done to the country because of the decisions of the country’s senior authorities? And perhaps most importantly, how could they justify the silencing of the voices and the despotism that we are experiencing now?”

Tajzadeh was arrested after the 2009 protests and his close associates say that rather than serving his prison term in a general ward, this political activist is serving his prison term in a quarantine space. They also say that he is now on a political strike.

In his letter, he makes a reference to the sermon and speech that ayatollah Khamenei gave on the first Friday congregational prayer in Tehran after the 2009 elections and questions the leader’s usage of the term “street ganging” for the protestors. He writes, “One question that has never been answered is that throughout the years between 2009 and 2011 groups called Ansare Hezbollah freely poured into the streets on the pretext of an article that appeared in a student newsletter with a circulation of 500 copies or the usage of a word in a book or in protest to a legal gathering, etc and attacked demonstrators whom they beat up and in some cases even burned public and private buildings of newspapers. They burned bookstores and cinema houses but never during the last 18 years have you even once protested against this street ganging and violence against the public and did not want these illegal gangs to be identified and punished on security and legal grounds. Are street protests illegal and undesired only for protestors and not for other groups?”

Tajzadeh has written other critical letters and articles from the prison. In one of them titled “Father and Mother, we continue to be accused” he criticized the actions and silence of reformists in the 1980s. When his wife Fakhralsadat Mohtashamipour was being tried in a revolutionary court, he wrote an open public letter to ayatollah Khamenei and charged that the Islamic republic was rapidly going down in ethics and spiritually and that the ideals and values of the revolution were being openly violated under the watch of ayatollah Khamenei.

In his latest letter, Tajzadeh references the criticism that Mir-Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karoubi, leaders of the reformist Green Movement who are both under house arrest, have raised about the lack of trust in state institutions, and asks, “Have state and official authorities behaved in a manner that would create trust and hope that the legal protests, violations and political fraud committed during the 2009 presidential elections would be investigated and looked into?”

In his letter, the former vice-minister also mentions the voting count issues that came up in the US presidential elections in Florida and in Afghanistan, but points out that none of them resulted in a crisis in their countries, and adds, “The roots of public mistrust in officials and legal investigations must be found in the unfulfilled promises of these authorities and institutions.”

Tajzadeh also uses the issues that came up in the latest round of elections in Russia – a key ally of the Islamic republic – and asks Khamenei, “Why do Iranian rulers not act like those in the Kremlin where protestors to the election results were allowed to hold their demonstrations. Why do they not try to act like Putin and stress the rights of the citizens rather than suppressing the protestors?” Is the right to protest an accepted democratic right if not then why does the Islamic republic itself support public groups in other countries that protests their government’s actions?”

He also points to Bahrain where an official fact finding investigation was launched after anti-government protests and asks why is a similar independent investigation not undertaken in Iran to look into the protests of 13 million people, as attested by state officials. He writes that the crises in Bahrain began because a small minority wants to revive a despotic regressive regime while the majority of the people there are resisting this.

Tajzadeh ends his letter by saying that supporters and opponents of the rulers of Iran agree that a change in the current situation and a change in the treatment of dissidents depends on the decision of the supreme leader and nobody else. “This alone indicates another reality which is that the way dissidents were treated was based on the leader’s decision.”

  Source: Rooz Online

Iran’s public executions in the spotlight

0

In Iran the death sentence is usually handed down for crimes such as murder, rape, homosexuality and until recently drug-related offences. The hangings usually take place in the early hours of the morning as the sun rises, often at the crime scene or in a city centre.

The families of both the victims and convicts gather as the authorities prepare to hang the condemned criminals from cranes.

Under Iran’s sharia law, the victim’s family has the right to spare the convict from execution for certain crimes such as when someone is convicted of killing another person in a car accident. This means many executions see the convict’s relatives incessantly pleading for a pardon.

A huge crowd, which might include children, usually surrounds the scene, such as in this video.

When Iranian authorities last year lifted a ban on photographing public executions, an Iranian photo-journalist, Ebrahim Noroozi, began to freely document them. For those pictures, he won a prize in the contemporary issues category of the 2012 edition World Press Photo in April this year.

The New York Times has this week published a gallery of Noroozi’s pictures along with a brief interview with him which you can read here.

“I don’t go to executions for fun. As a journalist I don’t want to pass judgment on whether they are good or bad, but the act itself disgusts me,” he told the Times.

According to Amnesty, at least 676 judicial executions are known to have been carried out in 2011 globally. More than half of those took place in Iran, which executed at least 360 people. But reports about the regime’s campaign of secret and mass hangings of prisoners have made it impossible for Amnesty to publish the true figures in Iran, like in China.

Source: Freedom Messenger

Iran to build nuclear-powered submarines

An Islamic Republic Navy official announced on Tuesday that Iran is beginning to design its first nuclear-powered submarine.

Fars News Agency reports that Admiral Abbas Zamini, the deputy navy chief in charge of technical affairs, said: “When we have peaceful nuclear technology, then we can also initiate plans for building nuclear-powered submarines.”

He added that the Islamic Republic needs nuclear-powered submarines in order to carry out operations on a wider range and to establish its presence in various parts of the world.

Iran is currently building several small- and medium-sized submarines domestically and has also overhauled large submarines bought from Russia.

Source: Radio Zamaneh