Home Blog Page 531

Evin Court refused to accept the set bail for Peyman Aref

0

 

Even though Iran’s Revolutionary Court has issued a bail of 20 million tomans ($18,500) for Peyman Aref, the officials at Evin prison refused to accept the bail money and prevented his release.

Per orders of Branch 6 of Evin’s Court, a few days after completing his second one-year prison term and being released, Peyman Aref was arrested again and transferred to ward 350 of Evin prison. When his wife went to the prison with the bail money after great efforts to secure the needed funds, she was denied entry into the prison court, and the officials refused to release Peyman.

According to Human Rights House of Iran, when Aref’s wife Samira Jamshidi went to the prison court, several prison officials attacked her resulting in a strong confrontation that subsided only after other officials and visitors intervened.

Peyman Aref had been released from Evin prison on October 9th after ending his one-year prison term and receiving 74 lashes for insulting the president.

Last Sunday he attended the funeral of Arash Sadeghi’s mother after which he and two of his activist friends went to the grave-site of Neda AghaSoltan and other martyrs of the post 2009 presidential elections. All three activist were detained and released the following day with orders to show up at the prison court on Tuesday to follow up on their court dossiers.

When Peyman and his friends showed up at the prison court on Tuesday, the other two were allowed to leave but Peyman was again arrested and transferred to Evin prison. He remains behind bars despite his wife’s efforts in delivering the bail money.

 

Source

Activists’ jail terms lengthened

0

 

An Iranian appeals court has approved new sentences for three prominent student activists who are already serving out earlier sentences.

Daneshjoo News reports that Bahraeh Hedayat, Majid Tavakoli and Mehdieh Golrou will now be serving longer sentences, after the appellate court confirmed their latest sentencing by Judge Maghiseh.

Bahreh Hedayat will now serve an extra six months, bringing her full sentence to 10 years in jail. Majid Tavakoli will serve eight and a half years, and Mehdieh Golrou, who was supposed to be released later this month, must now remain in jail until next May.

On this latest occasion, the three activists were summoned before court for having issued an announcement of solidarity and resistance on Iranian National Students Day last December. They were charged with “propaganda against the regime and collusion against national security.”

The three were admonished by Judge Maghiseh to recant their joint statement, which they refused to do.

The three activists were previously arrested in the crackdown on protesters following the controversial presidential elections of 2009.

 

Source

A military war of nerves against Iran: The US leads, Israel and UK go along

0

 

The sudden rush of military news Wednesday, Nov. 2, is part of an orchestrated Western performance to convince Tehran that the US, Britain and Israel are on the verge of a military operation against its nuclear installations. Directed from Washington, it is meant to warn Iran that the play could become a reality show if it refuses to give up the drive for a nuclear weapon. President Barack Obama may then decide to strike Revolutionary Guards Corps targets, the bulwark of the Islamic regime, and its strategic infrastructure, thereby knocking over the key props holding up the regime of the ayatollahs.
Contributing to the menacing climate hanging over Iran were four headline events involving Israel – all on the same Wednesday: Israel conducted a successful test launch of a new intercontinental ballistic missile, Jericho 3, which foreign sources report is capable of carrying a nuclear warhead 7,000 kilometers.

After that, the IDF released photographs of Israeli Air Force squadron leaders reporting from Italian air base runways  to the media on joint exercises they had conducted in long-range maneuvers with the Italian air force “and other NATO nations,” to familiarize the IAF with NATO military tactics.

The inference was clear: The Israeli Air Force was strengthening its cooperation with Western allies in preparation for a NATO assault on Iran. The IAF also got a chance to study the lessons Western alliance air force tacticians had drawn from the eight-month Libyan operation which ended on Oct. 31.
Next, the IDF’s Home Command announced a large-scale anti-missile exercise in central Israel starting Thursday morning, Nov. 3.
Finally, Defense Minister Ehud Barak left for an unscheduled trip to London shortly after a secret visit to Israel by the British chief of staff General Sir David Richards earlier this week as guest of Israel’s top soldier Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz.
If the British general was in Israel only this week, why was Barak is such a hurry to visit London?

The answer came from the British media, which reported as soon as he arrived that the Ministry of Defense in London had accelerated and upgraded its contingency planning for participation in a US-led assault on Iran. They carried an account of plans for deploying large naval units including submarines to the Persian Gulf.

The UK was reported to have asked Washington for permission to station its fighter-bombers on the Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia for launching bombing sorties against Iran.

This whirlwind of military activity was said to have been prompted by the approaching publication of the International Atomic Energy Agency’s Iran report next Tuesday, Nov. 8 and the conclusion the nuclear watchdog had reached: Inside 12 months, Iran will have tucked all its nuclear and ballistic missile facilities away in deep underground tunnels where they will be invulnerable to attack.
A potential US-British strike to pre-empt this move would also be timed for the run-up to America’s next presidential election in November 2012.

DEBKAfile’s military sources report that if the US, Britain and other NATO nations, such as France, Italy and Germany, participate in the attack, Israel will not. Its army, air force and navy will defend the home front, be available to engage Iran’s allies to prevent them from striking the assault forces from the rear, and act as a strategic reserve. The danger would come from Syria, the Lebanese Hizballah, and the Palestinian Hamas and Jihad Islami in the Gaza Strip.

These contingency plans are subject to changes, especially if President Obama and other NATO allies decide after all against attacking Iran in the coming year. The hyperactivity will then subside and Israel will be thrown back on the dilemma of having to decide whether or not to conduct a lone military operation against Iran.

There is not much time for contemplation. Syria and Hizballah are reported by DEBKAfile’s military sources to be in the throes of separate preparations for attacking Israel if their respective grips on power are shaken. For now, those sources rate the chances of Israel facing a military clash with Syria and/or Hizballah much higher than a NATO-Israeli showdown being mounted against Iran.

 

Source

Iranian foreign minister admits to involvement in Saudi ambassador assassination plot

0

 

An Iranian source told Al Arabiya that Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi confirmed the involvement of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard in the assassination plot against the Saudi ambassador to the United States, Adel al-Jubeir.

According to the source, which is close to Gholam Hussein Elham, former spokesman of the Iranian government and dissident from Ahmadinejad’s regime, Salehi recently met with Mohammed Nahavandian, former assistant at the National Security Council and the current president of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry.

In the meeting, both discussed several political and economic issues in addition to the plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador. It was then that Salehi admitted to the Revolutionary Guard’s involvement in it.

“This is true. The plot was about to be carried out. It is not a figment of the American authorities’ imagination,” Salehi was quoted by the source as saying.

Salehi is known for his close ties with Ayatollah Mohammed-Ali Taskhiri, an Iraqi with Iranian origins.

Nahavandian, a fundamentalist, is close to the speaker of the Iranian parliament, Ali Larijani, and is not on good terms with Ahmadinejad.

The United States on Tuesday dismissed as “a rant” an Iranian letter to Washington over allegations of an Iranian plot to murder the Saudi ambassador in Washington.

“We did receive a lengthy diplomatic note from the Swiss protecting power on behalf of the Iranians,” U.S. State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said after Washington received the letter from Swiss intermediaries.

In the absence of U.S.-Iranian diplomatic relations for more than three decades, Switzerland acts on behalf of U.S. interests in Tehran.

“It was about seven pages. It was a rant. It was full of all kinds of denials. There was not a lot new in there from our perspective,” Nuland told reporters.

In Tehran, Iran’s foreign ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast said that Iran had sent a letter to the United States seeking an “official apology of the Americans in protest of this made-up scenario.”

“Instead of pursuing this scenario and the wrong path of foreign policy in which they are moving, Americans had better move to correct this path,” Mehmanparast told reporters, as quoted by IRNA, the country’s official news agency.

“A letter has been sent [to the United States] … It is our right to seek the official apology of the Americans in protest of this made-up scenario, as these allegations are not true at all,” he said.

Tehran has strongly denied any involvement in what the U.S. says was a plot by the Quds force to kill the Saudi envoy by hiring assassins from a Mexican drug cartel for $1.5 million.

An Iranian-American, Manssor Arbabsiar, who is 56, was accused of being the central figure in the alleged plot; he pleaded not guilty to the charges last week in a New York court.

Iranian officials said the accusations were an attempt by Washington to divert attention from its domestic economic woes and foreign policy failures in the Middle East.

 

Source

Hossein Ronaghi Maleki returned to Evin Prison after undergoing two kidney surgeries

 

According to reports, prison officials transferred Hossein Ronaghi Maleki from the hospital back to Evin prison this morning, after he had undergone two operations on his kidneys. The imprisoned blogger and human rights activist, who suffers from a dangerous kidney ailment, was transferred to a hospital on October 25th, after he refused to receive any medicines or treatment from the prison’s clinic. The protest was against the prison authorities’ prevention of Hossein’s transfer to a qualified hospital- even though a few weeks ago, Tehran Prosecutor Abbas Jafari-Dolatabadi had officially ordered the transfer.

Hossein Ronaghi Maleki’s health is critical and he is in urgent need of prison leave to be under the care of a specialized physician. The imprisoned blogger’s father told Human Rights House of Iran that there are fears Hossein’s kidneys will become infected, and the infection will spread if Hossein is not provided with the proper medical care.

In less than a year, Hossein Ronaghi Maleki has undergone four operations on his kidneys. To date, he has spent close to 700  days behind bars, and the judicial and security officials have banned him from prison leave (furlough).

Hossein Ronaghi Maleki was arrested along with his brother on December 13, 2009 at their parents’ home in the Eastern Azerbaijan province during an operation to “dismantle a counterrevolutionary network.”  Reports indicate that Ronaghi Maleki had “written and used software to combat filtering and to host and support websites and blogs that defend human rights.” His brother was later released on an $80 thousand (USD) bail.

He is charged with “Membership in the Iran Proxy internet group”, “Propaganda against the regime”, and “Insulting the Supreme Leader and the President”. In December 2010, one year after his arrest, a 15-year prison sentence issued earlier for the blogger was finalized by the Islamic Republic Appeals Court. According to reports, Ronaghi Maleki’s lawyer and family were not present at the court when the sentence was issued. He was originally sentenced on October 3, 2010 by branch 26 of the Revolutionary Court, but he was not permitted to read the verdict. However, after he was beaten by [regime] officials, he was forced to sign the unread verdict.

Reporters Without Borders has said that this is the heaviest sentence for a blogger to date after the 19 and a half year sentence given to another blogger, Hossein Derakhshan.

According to various human rights reports, Ronaghi Maleki was severely physically and psychologically tortured for ten months while he was held in solitary confinement.

 

Source

Children of Arrested Baha’is: “We Have No Recourse”

 

Following the sentencing of seven Baha’is associated with the Baha’i Institute for Higher Education (BIHE) by Branch 28 of the Revolutionary Court, their families’ only hope is that the Appeals Court will change the ruling. They were each sentenced to four or five years in prison and were all transferred from Evin Prison to other prisons several days after the lower court ruling.

Naim Sobhani, son of Riaz Sobhani, who was sentenced to four years in prison by the lower court on the charge of providing financial assistance to the Baha’i University, told the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran that, “We have no recourse other than trying to change the judicial ruling [at the appeals stage]. Even though we know the Judiciary does whatever it wants on an arbitrary basis. We can’t even believe my father was sentenced to four years in prison for no crime or wrongdoing. Only for the reason of having helped the Baha’i University. Our father is very ill and may not last even one year in prison. He has heart problems and is under medical treatment, he also has digestive problems, and his eyesight is weak. He’s an old man after all.”

Judge Moghisseh, presiding over Branch 28 of the Revolutionary Court, sentenced Kamran Mortezaie and Vahid Mahmoudi each to five years. The same court sentenced Ramin Zibaie, Mahmoud Badavam, Farhad Sedghi, Riaz Sobhani and Noushin Khadem to four years in prison. A few days after the trial, without any explanation, Khadem was transferred to Rajee Shahr Prison in Karaj and the other six were transferred to Gohar Dasht Prison in Karaj.

Mahtab Morteziee, daughter of Kamran Mortezaie who was sentenced on charges of teaching and administrative tasks for the Baha’i University, told the Campaign, “My father is in Evin Prison and has developed back and knee pain. Apparently when he was in Evin he was held with three to four people in a very small cell. His leg pain is due to the fact that he only had enough space to stretch one leg out. He also developed back pain because in Evin he was forced to sleep on the floor. Now apparently his cell in Gohar Dasht Prison is a little bigger and also has a bed. Either way he’s had the need to be seen by a doctor a few times.”

According to a report by the Baha’i International Community (BIC) published on 19 October 2011, several members of the Baha’i community connected to BIHE from Tehran, Esfahan, and Karaj, have been arrested in the past five months. These individuals were either instructors of the online university or are related to the organization, which was created in order to provide higher education to Baha’i students prohibited from studying in Iranian universities.

BIHE was founded in the mid-1980s. This institute is not recognized legally by the Iranian government but since the 1979 revolution, after which Bahai’s were prohibited from attending universities, the Baha’i Community for the Promotion of Youth Learning established the institute to provide higher education for Baha’is.

Naim Sobhani, currently living in Washington DC, expressed surprise about his father’s transfer to Gohar Dasht Prison after the trial. “Without any reason or information my father was transferred to Gohar Dasht Prison. My brother and sister after following up realized that they transferred him to another prison. In a recent meeting with my father my family said they have no update as to his physical condition but his spirits are better because seven Bahai’ leaders are also being held in that prison. However, the distance to this prison is very far, and we really don’t know why they took him there from Evin.”

Naim Sobhani also objected to the blocking of his parents’ shared bank accounts, saying, “We don’t know why they blocked their bank accounts, in the ruling there wasn’t anything either. There is nothing we can do but accept it.”

Mahtab Mortezaee, currently residing in Maryland, spoke with the Campaign about her father’s activities in the institute. “My father taught courses on subjects such as development and computer science, and he also did administrative work for the office center. My aunt tells me that at the beginning my father’s spirits were better but now he’s a little frustrated and is not like he was in the first days.”

Baha’is are currently the largest religious minority in Iran that lacks the basic right of attending university. According to the BIC, currently at least 112 Baha’is in Iran are in prison because of their beliefs. Amongst those imprisoned are the seven leaders of the Baha’i community that were sentenced to twenty years in prison. The report also states that there are currently 300 cases of Baha’is being processed in the Iranian Judiciary.

Source

Peyman Aref arrested again and transferred to Evin prison

0

 

Political activist and journalist Peyman Aref who went to Evin court to follow up on the recent charges against him was arrested again and transferred to prison.

According to Human Rights House of Iran, Peyman Aref who had recently been released after serving his second one-year prison term went to the grave of Neda AghaSoltan this past Sunday. Fellow activists Assal Esmailzadeh and Sharar Konour Tabrizi accompanied him to the cemetery where all three were subsequently arrested and released after one day.

When the three activists went to Evin Court to process their court papers, the other two were released but Peyman Aref was detained and transferred to prison for undisclosed reasons.

Peyman Aref was arrested twice during the events following the contested presidential elections of 2009 for which he served two one-year sentences behind bars and received 74 lashes for insulting the president. This political activist was released on October 10, 2011 at the end of his one-year sentence, after the flogging sentence was carried out on him.

He is now once again behind bars.

 

Source

Obama’s Threatening Letter, Iran’s Stern Response

0

 

Roozonline – While the spokesman for Iran’s foreign ministry had said that he was not aware of any confidential letter by the president of the US to the leaders of the Islamic republic of Iran, the disclosure of the contents of such a letter and Tehran’s response to it which appeared in international media resulted in the publication of more details by media associated with ayatollah Khamenei.

Iran’s Rajanews and Fars news agency, both closely tied to Iran’s security and military establishment, yesterday reported on what they called were stern responses of officials of the Islamic republic to US president Barack Obama’s confidential letter to Iranian leaders.

The main headline of Kayhan newspaper, a daily run by a directly-appointed representative of ayatollah Khamenei, yesterday read: “Iran’s Response to White House’s Letter: The US Must Officially Apologize,” for accusing Iran of plotting a terrorist act on US soil.

On Sunday, the Associated Press had quoted an un-named US official confirming the receipt of a diplomatic note from Iran on Friday in which US claims against the Islamic republic were sternly protested. According to this source, Iran’s protest had been received through the Swiss embassy in Tehran which represents US interests in Iran.

The same report also quotes an Iranian diplomatic source as having said that in its response to Obama’s letter, the Islamic republic stressed the “fabricated” nature of the accusations against Iran and called for compensation by the US for the “moral and physical damage” caused to it.

Raja News’s website yesterday carried a report that US president Obama had sent a letter to the Islamic republic in the last two weeks in which the “fabricated scenario of Iran’s plot to kill the Saudi ambassador” was raised.

The Response of the Islamic Republic in Kayhan Newspaper

According to Kayhan, also closely tied to the security agencies of the Islamic republic, Obama had claimed in his letter that Iran had planned this assassination plot and quotes him to have addressed Iranian authorities that “if such a decision had not been planned at the highest levels, the two suspects would be handed over to the US.”

International and Iranian media have not specified to whom exactly was Obama’s letter addressed and who in the Iranian regime had responded to the letter.

Raja News wrote that Iran’s letter had also protested the “language” used in Obama’s letter, indicating the threatening nature of the note.

As reported by Kayhan, the letter of the Islamic republic to the US government had stressed on the fabricated scenario “based on fabricated information and engagement in behavior contrary to international rules resulting in moral and material damage to innocent people from different countries around the world, including the people of the United States, in which the US invasion of Iraq  is a prime example and which was itself based on fabricated information.”

In its report Raja News also claimed that the US president in his confidential letter had implicitly asked for talks with Iran, to which the Islamic republic had responded with silence, thus rejecting the call.

This appears to be the third letter that Obama had written to Iranian leaders.

Prior to this, Saeed Jalili, the secretary of Iran’s supreme national security council had confirmed that Obama had sent two letters prior to Iran’s tenth presidential election in June of 2009 to ayatollah Khamenei in which he had expressly stated that without regional and international problems would not be solved without the Islamic republic of Iran.

During his Friday sermon on June 19, 2009 in which he ordered the attack on demonstrations who were protesting the announced results of the 2009 presidential election in Iran, the country’s supreme leader had mentioned receiving a letter from the US and his advisor on international affairs Ali Akbar Velayati had subsequently confirmed this on a program on channel three of Iran’s television network.

Two Iranians have been implicated in the recent assassination claim by the US. One of the suspects, Gholam Shakoori, is in Iran and it appears that Obama’s most recent letter to Iranian leaders may have asked for him to be handed over to the US.

The US had submitted its evidence for the plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador to Washington to the UN Security Council earlier, documents which implicate the Ghods Force belonging to Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps. Both the US and Saudi Arabia have also filed official complaints with the Security Council against the Islamic republic.

 

Source

The morning after the attack on Iran

0

One of the less discussed aspects of a possible Israeli attack on Iran is the international community’s response. A plausible scenario that should be taken into account is the possibility of massive international pressure on Israel. This would consist of American pressure (assuming the attack is carried out without the United States’ agreement ) for disarming from the nuclear weapons Israel supposedly has, or to join the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and subject its nuclear facilities to the International Atomic Energy Agency’s supervision.

This scenario becomes less imaginary in view of the decision made by the treaty’s review conference in June regarding Israel, and especially the change in the United States’ position on the global nuclear arms issue. An attack launched by a state believed to possess nuclear weapons outside the NPT on another, even if the latter aspires to obtain nuclear weapons, will be comprehensively and totally condemned.

 

Even those few researchers of Israel’s defense policy who think, as I do, that Israel must reach an agreement to disarm the Middle East of weapons of mass destruction deem this scenario undesirable, to put it mildly. If Israel withstands the pressure, it could find itself in isolation, possibly including an embargo on weapons, materiel and equipment for both military and civilian uses. If Israel succumbs to the pressure, it will be forced to give up a strategic bargaining chip that could lead to a regional defense regimen, including a reliable nuclear demilitarization (with regional supervision and monitoring systems with higher credibility standards that IAEA’s ).

Yet again it transpires that Israel’s nuclear policy is fundamentally erroneous. There is no proof this policy has achieved even one of its declared goals. It did not prevent attacks on populated areas in the Gulf War, the Second Lebanon War or from Gaza. A nuclear threat cannot be used to quash an intifada. The peace agreements with Egypt and Jordan, in which Israel’s nuclear capability played no role, significantly reduced the conventional threat on Israel. And most importantly, every time someone in the Middle East begins developing nuclear weapons, we stop believing in nuclear deterrence and set out to destroy the Arab/Iranian potential.

There is considerable evidence attesting that Israel’s nuclear capability constituted both an incentive and a model for the attempts of several states in the region to develop nuclear weapons, and accelerated the chemical and biological capabilities of Syria, Saddam Hussein’s Iraq and even Egypt. If the Israeli offensive fails, or if Israel is “persuaded” to refrain from attacking and Iran obtains a nuclear capability, other states in the region could follow in its footsteps.

The reality of a nuclear Middle East is becoming increasingly likely. The dilemma Israel faces in the longer run is between a nuclear Middle East and a demilitarized one. Either everyone in the region has nuclear weapons or no state has.

The growing likelihood of tomorrow’s scenario also requires a reexamination of nuclear policy. An Israeli initiative for a complete demilitarization of the Middle East of weapons of mass destruction should be considered. Israel could lead a move that would create a defense regimen on its own terms – instead of unilateral disarmament following international pressure. The nuclear horizon is not so distant. It is time to consider what lies beyond it.

source

Ahmadinejad’s foes flex power in Iran’s parliament

0

 

AP – Iran’s internal political battles have reached this point before: Lawmakers demanding that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad become the first Iranian president hauled before parliament for a grilling on government policies.

Each time, Ahmadinejad was given a reprieve by Iran’s supreme leader, who apparently wanted to avoid an embarrassing spectacle. But there may be no such easy exit this time for the president.

His ties have frayed badly with supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who for months has been trying to put his upstart protege in his place. And the mood is increasingly cutthroat within Iran’s leadership as its factions jockey for parliamentary elections fewer than five months away.

“Iran has always been a place of high political theater,” said Shadi Hamid, director of research at the Brookings Doha Center in Qatar. “It’s the tone that has gotten more bitter as the stakes have gotten higher.”

A scandal surrounding a $2.6 billion bank fraud, the biggest financial abuse case in Iran’s history, has given Ahmadinejad’s opponents the opportunity to humble the president and his supporters ahead of the parliamentary election. Parliament has begun steps to oust his economy minister, and on Sunday 73 of the 290 lawmakers — just above the required 25 percent threshold — signed a petition to question Ahmadinejad on the investigation.

Ahmadinejad is not directly linked to the corruption investigation and faces no apparent danger of being toppled. And it’s still unclear when — or if — he could be ordered to appear in the chamber.

But a possible Watergate-style inquest in parliament — what he knew and when he knew it — would be seen as a crowning moment for his political foes after months of wide-open attacks.

Ahmadinejad is accused by opponents of crossing the ultimate red line in Iran: Trying to expand the powers of the presidency to challenge the near-absolute authority of Khamenei, who heads the ruling theocracy.

Dozens of Ahmadinejad’s allies have been arrested or driven off the political map. Ahmadinejad’s protege and closest aide, Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei, has been vilified in state media as leader of a “deviant current” that seeks to compromise the Islamic system.

None of the pressures could have come without approval from Khamenei, who has the final say in all key matters.

In recent months, Khamenei intervened to block several attempts by lawmakers to question Ahmadinejad. The apparent reason was to protect Iran’s image and avoid uncomfortable scenes of Ahmadinejad facing angry parliament critics.

But Khamenei could let events take their course this time, some experts say, as his statements suggest a more aggressive stance against perceived threats to the Islamic system.

Earlier this month, Khamenei fired a powerful warning shot at Ahmadinejad — or any successor — seeking to siphon off powers from the ruling clerical establishment, saying that Iran could someday scrap the post of elected president if political needs demand. The supreme leader has also called for “cutting off the traitorous hands” of those implicated in the banking scandal.

The ruling clerics could be thinking ahead to Iran’s next big test at the ballot box.

A humbling call into parliament for Ahmadinejad could further embolden his political opponents before parliamentary elections in March. The voting is seen by Khamenei’s supporters — including the ultra-powerful Revolutionary Guard — as an important warm up for the presidential contest in June 2013.

The ruling clerics vet all candidates for both races, suggesting the outcome could further strengthen the hold of hard-liners and the Revolutionary Guard, whose reach extends from the military to most key sectors of the economy.

Ahmad Bakhshayesh, a political affairs professor at Tehran’s Azad University, said there is a growing sense that Khamenei now may let Ahmadinejad’s opponents in parliament take full aim at the president.

“The financial scandal has intensified the mood,” he said. “Lawmakers concluded it was time to use their power.”

But first, there is the issue of Economy Minister Shamsoddin Hosseini, who could face an impeachment vote in parliament Tuesday.

A parliamentary investigation concluded that Hosseini, his deputies and managers of the Central Bank of Iran and other banks knew about the massive fraud and failed to take action. The scam, allegedly masterminded by a businessman, involved the use of forged documents to obtain credit from at least two Iranian state banks to purchase state-owned companies.

At least 35 suspects have been arrested.

Ahmadinejad still retains significant support among lawmakers, who could try to stall or derail the petition to bring him for questioning. One of the anti-Ahmadinejad lawmakers, Mohammad Dehghan, said there was heavy lobbying Monday by the president’s backers to drop the bid, according to the semiofficial Mehr news agency.

A member of the parliament’s presiding council, Hossein Sobhaninia, said the lawmakers plan to question a representative of Ahmadinejad before deciding on whether to call the president before the chamber.

“Nothing in Iran comes out of nowhere,” said Mehrzad Boroujerdi, an Iranian affairs expert at Syracuse University, referring to Khamenei’s warning over the presidency post.

“Khamenei seems to be a mind to let this go to parliament this time,” he added. “It’s one way of further reining in Ahmadinejad after reading him the riot act and letting him know, `Look, I can hurt you in so many ways.'”

 

Source