Home Blog Page 469

Revolutionary Guard Mulls Over Domination of Oil Ministry

By: Hossein Alizadeh

Introduction:

Iranbriefing: According to unreleased reports, in numerous meetings with the Supreme Leader, the Revolutionary Guard has put forward the idea of transferring control of the oil ministry from the government to the Supreme Leader. The oil ministry, Iran’s richest institution and a vital source of revenue, is currently run by one of the commanders of the Revolutionary Guard, Rostam Ghasemi.

To facilitate the grounds for the Revolutionary Guard to meet its aspirations, the Majlis,

Hossein Alizadeh

Parliament, has ratified a bill which allows the head of the Association of Shareholders of National Iranian Oil Company to nominate the oil minister, a task which the president used to handle before.

The Revolutionary Guard’s Previous Role in Oil Ministry

There is no doubt that the oil ministry is the most significant institution for the Islamic Republic which accounts for 80% of Iran’s total annual income.

The Revolutionary Guard has seemingly taken the decision to transfer control of the oil ministry to the Supreme Leader under heavy pressure exerted by the sanctions imposed by western countries on Iran’s oil industry, which have caused heavy damage to such money making industry. To remain as a ministry, as it is now, the oil ministry has to submit its annual balance sheet to the parliament. Therefore, any sort of transparency in the annual balance sheet will show the extent of damage caused by the sanctions imposed on Iran’s oil industry.

Should it be assumed that such a money-making industry has been hit by the sanctions, this can have serious repercussions and implications for Iran’s oil-based economy.

Therefore, it is to the interest of the system to remove transparency in the oil industry, and that can be made possible only when the oil ministry goes under the control of the Supreme Leader. It is a known fact that hundreds of financial institutions which are being run by the Supreme Leader are not answerable to the country’s judicial or executive bodies and are exempt from paying tax.

With such justification, Iran’s oil industry, freed from British hands by sacrifices made by stalwarts such as 1950s Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh, is practically going to be colonized by domestic gangs who consider themselves above any supervision.

A cursory glance at what has been happening in the oil ministry during last six years reveals the scale and depth of the tragedy. At the beginning of Ahmadinejad’s presidency in the ninth government, three of his nominees for the oil ministry, Ali Saeidlou, Sadegh Mahsouli and Mohsen Tahasoli, were not even qualified enough to receive votes of confidence by the lawmakers, and due to a delay in introducing new nominees, the ministry was left with no minister for a period of six months, and many contracts were not implemented as a result.

At the end, Mohammad Kazem Vaziri Hamaneh, caretaker of the oil ministry and one of the most qualified managers of the oil ministry, was unwillingly introduced by Ahmadinejad to lead the oil ministry and survived the vote of confidence by the parliamentarians. However, his administration over the oil ministry did not last for more than one and half years as he was sacked by Ahmadinejad in August 2007 due to his insistence that his position to maintain the oil ministry’s real identity and prevent irresponsible individuals from playing any part in the ministry. He was then succeeded by Gholam Hossein Nozari.

Nozari had a similar faith. He was sacked by Ahmadinejad and succeeded by Masoud Mir Kazemi, Ahmadinejad’s sixth nominee for the oil ministry, who became his third oil minister once he was endorsed by Parliament. Ironically, he was not able to serve the oil ministry for more than two years as he was sacked by Ahmadinejad and succeeded by Rostam Ghasemi, then commander of the Revolutionary Guard, who became Ahmadinejad’s forth oil minister.

During last six years, Ahmadinejad has introduced seven nominees for the oil ministry of whom Nozari, Hamaneh, Kazemi and Ghasemi have been able to survive the vote of confidence by Parliamentarians. Ironically, only two of the seven nominees, Hamaneh and Nozari, had previously worked in the oil ministry and the rest had no previous record in the oil industry. Three of the seven nominees, Mahsouli, Mir Kazemi and Rostam Ghasemi, were senior members of the Revolutionary Guard, a fact which shows that Ahmadinejad has never concealed his zeal to offer the oil ministry to the members of Revolutionary Guard.

Cancerous Growth

The appointment of one of the commanders of the Revolutionary Guard, Rostam Ghasemi, to lead the oil ministry was indeed a step forward in cancerous growth of the Revolutionary Guard. As we know, the Revolutionary Guard has not only dominated the oil and gas sectors, but also all development projects. Rostam Ghasemi is not the only commander of the Revolutionary Guard who has taken the oil revenue under his control. There were other commanders of the Revolutionary Guard who had previously taken hold of development projects. In fact, the Revolutionary Guard is the biggest contractor in the oil and gas sectors as well as road and dam construction.

Amazingly, Iran’s three major ministries, oil ministry, energy ministry and road ministry, are plummeted into the hands of the Revolutionary Guard as they are currently run by the commanders of the Revolutionary Guard.

According to Morad Veisi, a scholar who has done extensive research on the Revolutionary Guard, “The most important point is that there are three parties involved in every development project, and they are contractor, employer and consultant. It seems that in the oil, energy and road ministries, it is the Revolutionary Guard itself which carries out all the mentioned tasks. That means the Revolutionary Guard is both the employer and contractor, and sometimes it works as consultant.”

Majid Namjoo, current energy minister, is a former member of the Revolutionary Guard. He has been holding numerous posts such as project manager and head of development programs at the Constructive Base of the Revolutionary Guard, Head of the Engineering Department of the 41 Army of Sarallah, General-Director of Sarallah Constructive Institution, Deputy Head of the Karbala and Khatam al-Anbia Constructive Bases for development projects.

According to the latest changes that have occurred in the road ministry by Nikzad, current minister of road, those who have had previous record in the Revolutionary Guard have been appointed as deputies and managers of the development projects.

Therefore, the Revolutionary Guard has not only been able to boost its political influence following the Iran-Iraq war, but also the Khatam al-Anbia military-base, the Revolutionary Guard’s powerful economic wing, has been able to win multi-billion dollar contracts without any kind of credible and competitive tender.

Following are such contracts:

1- $1.3 billion contract for constructing a 900 km gas pipeline for transferring 50 million cubic meters of natural gas from Asalouyeh to the Hormozgan, Sistan, and Baluchistan provinces. The contract was awarded to Khatam al-Anbia by the National Iranian Gas Company.

2- Three days after the $1.3 contract between the Revolutionary Guard and the oil ministry, the National Housing Company and Ghorb Company, previously associated with the Revolutionary Guard and the later with the Underprivileged Foundation, secured a $2.4 billion contract with Tehran’s metro.

3- $2.5 billion contract awarded to Khatam al-Anbia for development of the Phases 15 and 16 of the South Pars gas fields.

4-  In June 2006, the Revolutionary Guard was awarded with water and electricity projects in the western parts of the country. According to the contract, which was made between the Revolutionary Guard and the energy ministry, all the dam construction projects in West Azerbaijan, Lorestan, Ilam, Kurdistan, Kermanshah and Khuzestan provinces will be fully awarded to the Revolutionary Guard.

Conclusion

Given what has been mentioned, one has to wait and see if the control of oil ministry is going to be transferred to Supreme Leader. Perhaps it will occur, should the political system be changed from presidential to the parliamentary one as envisaged by the Supreme Leader.


Government officials accused in great fraud case

0

 

The Tehran Prosecutor’s office has announced that several government officials and MPs have been accused in Iran’s recent $3-billion bank fraud.

Iranian media report that Mehdi Farahani further announced that members of the Melli Bank and the Bank of Saderat boards of management are also charged in the case and are currently banned from leaving the country.

Also under arrest is the office manager who worked under former Melli Bank CEO Mahmoudreza Khavari, and other members of the bank’s management team are currently released on bail.

Khavari, the former head of the Melli Bank, left the country a few days after news of the $3-billion scandal first hit the media. He took up residence in Canada, where he already held citizenship.

Farahani added that several Members of Parliament and government officials are also charged but they will not be named at this time in order to protect the national interest.

Farahani did indicate, however, that the prime suspects in the case were aided in their illegal actions by the support of Allaeddin Boroujerdi, the head of Foreign Policy and Parliament’s National Security Commission.

Those charged are accused of illegally raising $3 billion through the sale of fake letters of credit.

 Source: radiozamaneh

Shaqfa: Iran supports massacre in Syria

0

 

Riad al-Shaqfa, president of the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood, says Iran is a partner in the massacre being carried out by the ruling Assad regime and that the Brotherhood has evidence to prove it.

In an exclusive interview with Today’s Zaman on Thursday, Shaqfa said they have abundant evidence to prove this partnership. He said Iran is providing political, financial and military support to President Bashar al-Assad’s government, but particularly military support, via Iraq. Shaqfa underlined that there is a large number of Iranian military experts in Syria who are committing this massacre. Regarding Iran’s stance on the Syrian issue, Shaqfa stressed that Iran is “contradicting itself.” “For approximately 14 centuries Iranians have been grieving against the oppression of Husain, the grandson of Prophet Muhammad. But now they are standing next to the oppressor instead of standing next to the oppressed.”

When asked how to read Annan’s six-point peace plan, Shaqfa said if the plan is applied as mentioned, it would mean the end of the current regime. “If the regime accepts the plan, they will try to buy more time and will do their best to show that the plan is a failure.” He also added that any democratic election in Syria, which could be held under international oversight, will bring about the end of the regime. He said the plan is important and that the Muslim Brotherhood would like to see it succeed.

Touching upon the possibility of UN intervention, Shaqfa said their experience has shown them that neither the Western countries nor the United Nations took serious action on the Syrian issue and he added that approximately 12,000-13,000 people have died and 10,000 were displaced, while the international community still remains silent.

Shaqfa asserted that the current regime can be toppled in only one of two ways, either by an international intervention or when the Free Syrian Army comes to power. “If the Annan plan fails, we want the Security Council to take into consideration the security of the civilians if there is an intervention. Additionally, even if a decision is made, we do not expect the Western powers to intervene in Syria. In this case, we only believe that a union, where Turkey is also included, can intervene in order to maintain peace,” said Shaqfa. “The Syrians expect a lot from the Turks, and Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s recent statement declaring that Syria is Turkey’s internal matter is evidence of this. We can also understand this by looking at the people on the streets with Turkish flags in their hands.”

The leader of the Brotherhood also spoke about opposition groups in the region, saying that the Brotherhood wants a smooth transition and, in order to ensure that, they have brought together 85 percent of the opposition under the umbrella of the Syrian National Council (SNC). He added that they have good relations with these groups, with the exception of the Kurdish groups. According to Shaqfa, the Kurdish groups have some demands that are unacceptable. He underlined that the Muslim Brotherhood was ready to give them all the rights they want. But, he added, some Kurdish groups have very different demands; for instance, they want autonomy, which in turn will lead to the splitting up of Syria. He pointed out that this was not the vision of all the Kurds and that there is a sizeable population of Kurds represented in the SNC.

Touching upon the possibility of an agreement between the Kurdish faction and the Assad regime, Shaqfa stated that this was impossible because even the Kurds who are not represented in the SNC are extremely against the Assad regime. He underlined that the only Kurdish group supporting Assad is the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK). “Assad provides military training to the PKK in various camps in order to use the PKK against Turkey,” Shaqfa explained. “Theirs is a relationship of mutual interests.”

Shaqfa also claimed that the Syrian regime is an enemy to its neighbors. “The regime wanted to spur a sectarian war in Lebanon. It assassinated politicians in Jordan and now it is providing training to the PKK near Aleppo.” When asked about the danger of a civil war in Syria, Shaqfa said they do not expect one. “The current regime is trying to create a civil war and it was successful in Homs. In order to accomplish this, the regime sent some intelligence forces to kill Alawite families. It did the same to the Sunni families,” said Shaqfa.

“So why did he [Assad] do this? He did this to show to the world that there is a sectarian conflict in Syria. But the people of Homs were aware of this and they did not fall into this trap.” According to the Brotherhood leader, there is currently an agreement between the armed groups in the opposition and the Free Syrian Army, which states that they will not attack civilian targets and government buildings. “The Free Syrian Army is only engaged in self-defense and protecting civilians. Its only goal is to protect the civilians in the demonstrations. If an attack is staged against civilians, then and only then will they respond,” he said.

Shaqfa said there have been promises made that upcoming talks in Paris will be more productive and set clear demands of the current Syrian regime. “But we don’t believe that these promises will be fulfilled. We had great expectations from the İstanbul meeting, but the meeting failed to bring success,” said Shaqfa. “We would have had some success, at least, if they had officially recognized the SNC, but they didn’t and so I don’t expect much from the Paris conference.”

 Source: TodaysZaman

Revolutionary Court Unqualified to Review Case, Says Mohammad Seifzadeh

 

Prominent human rights lawyer Mohammad Seifzadeh refuses to participate in his upcoming trial session, his wife Fatemeh Golzar told the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran.

“Mr. Seifzadeh will not appear at this court session again for the same reason as before–he does not recognize the Revolutionary Court as qualified to review this case. He believes he should be tried in the Tehran Province Criminal Court, in the presence of a jury qualified to review press and political charges. As in the past, he will not participate and he has asked me as his lawyer to submit the bill he has written prior to the time the court convenes and not to participate in the proceedings,” Fatemeh Golzar told the Campaign.

In April 2011, security forces arrested Mohammad Seifzadeh, lawyer and, along with Nobel Peace Prize laureate Shirin Ebadi, a founding member of the Defenders of Human Rights Center, on the charge of “illegally exiting the country.” During his detention, he wrote a letter to former Iranian President Mohammad Khatami, and two critical articles about “laws governing pardons,” and the “definition of a political crime,” as well as signing several group statements in prison. Authorities accuse Seifzadeh of “collusion and assembly against national security.” His first trial session was scheduled for 10 January 2012, and he refused to appear at court. Mohammad Seifzadeh’s lawyer submitted his defense bill to the court. The court session was renewed for 11 March, and now for the third time for 9 April.

“We requested leave for him for the New Year, but, unfortunately, it was not approved.  My last visit with him was on 2 April and he appeared fine,” said Golzar.

In October 2010, the prominent human rights lawyer was sentenced to nine years in prison and ten years’ ban on practicing law on charges of “acting against national security through co-founding the Defenders of Human Rights Center. In 2011, an appeals court reduced his sentence to two years in prison. He continues to await results of his case on charges of “illegally exiting the country,” and “writing a letter to Khatami.”

 

Source: iranhumanrights

Aiming to boost influence, Iran maneuvers candidate to succeed Iraqi Shiite spiritual leader

0

 

Iran is promoting a conservative cleric close to its supreme leader as a possible successor for the aging spiritual leader of Iraq’s Shiites, a move that would give Tehran a powerful platform to influence its neighbor, according to figures close to Iraq’s religious leadership.

The 81-year-old spiritual leader, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, is one of the most influential figures in Iraq, revered by its Shiite majority as well as by Shiites around the world. In the years after the 2003 U.S.-led invasion and fall of Saddam Hussein, he was strong enough to shape the new Iraq, forcing American leaders and Iraqi politicians to revise parts of their transition plans he objected to.

The man Iran is maneuvering in hopes of eventually replacing him is Grand Ayatollah Mahmoud Hashemi Shahroudi, a prominent insider in the clerical hierarchy that rules Iran. He was the head of Iran’s judiciary for 10 years until 2009, playing a major role in suppressing the country’s reform movement, and sits on one of Iran’s main ruling councils.Shahroudi has started to build a presence in Najaf, the Iraqi holy city of dozens of seminaries that is the center of Shiism’s religious leadership, to which many of the world’s 200 million Shiites turn for spiritual and political guidance. Posters bearing his portrait have sprung up in the Baghdad district of Sadr City, a bastion of Shiite activism and home to some 2.5 million Shiites.

Iran’s growing influence in Iraq — through the economy and ties with Shiite politicians in Baghdad — is already a source of alarm to the United States and its Gulf Arab allies who see Shiite-majority Iran as a rival.It would boost Tehran’s voice in Iraq even more if Shahroudi ever succeeds al-Sistani as “al-marjaa al-akbar,” or “the greatest object of emulation.”

The 63-year-old Shahroudi would likely take an even more assertive political role than al-Sistani has. Al-Sistani adheres to a “quietist” school of Shiism that rejects formal rule by clerics, in contrast to Iran’s school in which clerics hold ultimate power.

Also, al-Sistani has lived in seclusion for years — he is thought not to have left his Najaf house since 2004 — and some feel he has grown out of sync with Iraq’s new generation of young and empowered Shiites. Disillusioned over unemployment and erratic services, many young Shiites are looking for a more dynamic religious leadership to counter what they see as the rising power of Sunni fundamentalists in the Arab world.

“Iraq’s Shiites are deeply politicized and they have had enough of traditional marjaiyah (religious authorities) like al-Sistani’s,” said one insider in Najaf, who is in daily contact with the city’s top clerics. “Iran is taking advantage of this by working energetically to replace him with one of its own.”

The insider is one of six who are well connected to the Shiites’ secretive religious establishment in Najaf and in Baghdad. They said Shahroudi appears to be angling for the post. They spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject.

Al-Sistani, who was treated in London for heart problems in 2004, remains healthy and alert, according to visitors who saw him recently. But his advanced age has fueled speculation about his succession in Najaf.But the succession does not necessarily have to wait until al-Sistani’s death. It could effectively take place if al-Sistani is deemed too old to guide his followers.

The position of al-marjaa al-akbar is considered the highest in Shia Islam’s spiritual hierarchy, more elevated than the several dozen clerics with “marjaa” — or “object of emulation” — status in the Shiite world. Pious Shiites generally choose a marjaa to follow. Al-Sistani has been al-marjaa al-akbar since the 1990s.

Filling the post is done by an informal process of consensus among senior and middle-ranking clerics, aimed at choosing the learned and respected figure. “Campaigning” for it means showing religious clout among Shiites in general and in Najaf specifically.

Ibrahim al-Baghdadi, Shahroudi’s top aide in Najaf, would not say if Shahroudi has ambitions for the position. Morteza Monajjem, a spokesman for Shahroudi’s office in the holy city of Qom, Iran’s religious capital, said the cleric “has no plan to stand next to other marjaas” and “has not officially defined himself as a marjaa.”

Still, Shahroudi is laying the necessary groundwork.

He opened a representative office in Najaf in October and plans to visit the city soon, according to al-Baghdadi.

He has begun paying monthly stipends to poor seminary students, organizing “study circles” and collecting the “khoms” from followers — a tithe of a fifth of one’s income. He has sent cleric-deputies to Shiite provinces in Iraq, al-Baghdadi said. He has also increased his issuing of fatwas, or religious edicts, in response to questions sent to his website.

Any ayatollah with aspirations of becoming a marjaa must write a religious textbook known as a “Tawdih al-Masail,” or “Clarification of Issues,” laying out rules for daily religious practice. Shahroudi published his just over a year ago.

Shahroudi is already known to be the spiritual leader of powerful Iraqi factions, including followers of the Badr Organization as well as most members of the Iranian-backed Shiite Hezbollah Brigades militia active in southern Iraq, and Asaib Ahl al-Haq, a hardline faction.

Among his students in Qom were Hassan Nasrallah, leader of Lebanon’s Hezbollah movement, and Humam Hamoudi, a prominent Iraqi politician.

Shahroudi is also believed to have replaced a grand ayatollah who died in 2010 as the spiritual mentor of the Dawa Party, Iraq’s oldest and most powerful Shiite political group. Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, the Dawa leader, visited Shahroudi during a recent visit to Iran.

Shahroudi was born in Najaf to Iranian parents in a family of clerics that claims descent from the Prophet Muhammad. He studied under Grand Ayatollah Mohammed Baqir al-Sadr, a prominent scholar credited with modernizing Shiite doctrine before he was executed by Saddam in 1980. Shahroudi fled a 1979 crackdown against Shiites and took refuge in Iran.

There, he became the first leader of the Supreme Council of the Islamic Revolution in Iraq, a major opposition group of Iraqi Shiite exiles. The group became a major political player in post-Saddam Iraq and its successor party is in al-Maliki’s ruling coalition.

Shahroudi also rose in Iran’s clerical leadership. He is so close to supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei that he has been cited by many observers as his possible successor.

Still, the Najaf insiders caution there are challenges in his path to succeed al-Sistani.

Muqtada al-Sadr, the young anti-American cleric whose followers have 40 of parliament’s 325 seats, has been in Iran studying to become a marjaa. But he is believed to need several more years before he can reach the rank of ayatollah, a status below marjaa, according to one of his aides in Iraq.

One of Shahroudi’s former students in Qom — now an Iraqi politician — said Shahroudi is strongly positioned.

“He is relatively young, he is familiar with modern day issues and has impeccable family pedigree,” he said. “The Shiite street wants a dynamic marjaa who can compensate it for the failure of the government.”

Source: insideofiran

Nasrin Sotoudeh Denied Furlough, Telephone Contact

 

Prominent human rights defender Nasrin Sotoudeh was deprived of furlough and telephone contact with her family during the Persian New Year, her husband Reza Khandan told the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran in an interview.

“Unfortunately, after two years of imprisonment, her leave was denied and she and the other women in her ward were not even allowed to make telephone calls to their families during the holidays. Some male political prisoners were allowed to spend Nowruz near their families, but none of the female political prisoners were allowed even hourly leave during these special days. We did not hear from Ms. Sotoudeh from 19 through 29 March. Ten days after Nowruz, they finally allowed visitation, and the kids and I were able to see her,” said Khandan.

Khandan added that this is the second year Sotoudeh’s family is spending the Persian New Year without her. “We regard Ms. Sotoudeh’s sentence as one without any legitimacy, and we also [object to] the lack of observation of her basic rights in prison. She has been denied the right to make telephone calls for almost a whole year. Many non-political prisoners have telephone sets above their beds and they can call whomever they want daily. They can even take care of their business affairs by phone. But female political prisoners, even on our most important celebration, Nowruz, were deprived from having simple phone calls to their families.”

Sotoudeh’s husband also told the Campaign that her family continues to believe she is being detained illegally and demands her prompt release.

The most important point is the illegal arrest of Nasrin Sotoudeh without a crime.  She is a mother of two young children who has been in prison for the past 19 months.  We demand her prompt release.  She and the other prisoners who have been detained for unfounded reasons and who do not have a scrap of criminal element inside their case files must be released immediately, [the Judiciary] knows this better than the rest of us,”

Nasrin Sotoudeh was arrested on 21 September 2010, and on 8 January 2011, she was sentenced to 11 years in prison, 20 years’ ban on her legal practice, and 20 years ban on foreign travel on charges of “acting against national security,” “collusion and propagation against the Islamic Republic,” and “membership in the Defenders of Human Rights Center.” Her sentence was subsequently upheld in its entirety by an appeals court.

“The policy the authorities have adopted vis-a-vis the political prisoners has been one of silence. Unfortunately, none of the officials consider themselves accountable to the families of political prisoners. We have never received any replies to our written and verbal requests. I mean even if you write ten furlough or any other types of request, if the officials are against it, they never provide you with an answer about their reasons for opposing it.  hey completely ignore our letters and verbal requests. I don’t know why they denied a leave for Ms. Sotoudeh.”

 

Source: iranhumanrights

Despite Posting Bail, Former Tehran Mayor Remains in Security Ward

 

74-year-old political prisoner and former mayor of Tehran Mohammad Tavassoli continues to be held in prison despite his deteriorating physical condition and posting bail, said Mehdi Nourbakhsh in an interview with the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran.

Dr. Mehdi Nourbakhsh, a close relative of the political prisoner, told the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran that Tavassoli’s family wrote a letter to the Head of the Judiciary and Intelligence Minister requesting his release during the Persian New Year holiday (March 21-April 2).

Nourbakhsh told the Campaign that officials have not responded to the family’s letter, and their concerns have grown. “Mohammad Tavassoli’s family is seriously concerned about his conditions. Mr. Tavassoli has lost a lot of weight during his prison stay. In a letter addressed to the Head of the Judiciary, they have requested his transfer from [the Intelligence Ministry’s] Ward 209 into the General Ward, as there is high pressure and hardship in the security wards and Mr. Tavassoli cannot endure such pressure due to his old age. His family has also asked for his immediate release, as the investigative judge in charge of his case has issued bail orders for him and the bail has also been posted, but he remains imprisoned. In fact Mohammad was neither released, nor transferred to the General Ward.”

On 2 November 2011 security forces arrested Mohammad Tavassoli, head of Iran Freedom Movement’s Political Office, at his home. His arrest came after a letter signed by 143 Iranian political and social activists, addressed to Mohammad Khatami, expressing doubt about free, healthy, and fair elections.

“After several months of imprisonment, he was given a 36-hour leave to attend his daughter’s wedding. This is when his family noticed his visible weight loss and gauntness,” added Nourbakhsh, who is currently a US resident.

“Of course Mr. Tavassoli told them that he has not been physically tortured, but the conditions in Ward 209 are ridden with psychological pressure and this has created concern for his family that Tavassoli may not be able to endure this pressure. Most importantly, [the Judge] has issued a bail ruling for Mohammad, and his family have submitted the collateral, too, but he is not released and so far they have not offered any answers about why they are not releasing him,” he added.

Mohammad Tavassoli was Tehran’s first Mayor after the 1979 Islamic Revolution. He has been repeatedly arrested and tortured since that time. Prior to his recent arrest, his last arrest came only days after the 2009 presidential election, when he spent about two months inside Evin Prison’s Ward 209.

 

Source: iranhumanrights

U.S. officials debate virulence of Iran-backed Hezbollah’s threat

0

 

The warning last month from Representative Peter King, the chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on Homeland Security, was blunt: An investigation by his staff had determined that “hundreds” of people he described as “Iranian and Hezbollah terrorists” were in the United States.

But interviews with U.S. intelligence and law enforcement officials, as well as private experts, about the Iranian-sponsored group paint a more nuanced picture. There is a threat, though whether it is imminent or extensive is far from clear, they say.

An alarming part of the officials’ assessments focuses on the apparent surveillance missions that Iranian diplomats and possible Hezbollah operatives have been seen conducting at sensitive targets such as New York subways and bridges, and at nuclear power plants and tunnels elsewhere in the United States in the past 10 years.

At the same time, U.S. officials caution that Hezbollah, a militia based in Lebanon, has largely avoided attacking U.S. targets since it carried out mass-casualty bombings in the 1980s against the U.S. Embassy and Marine barracks in Beirut. One reason may be that it does not want to endanger its lucrative North American fund-raising operations.

The renewed focus on Hezbollah – which U.S. counter-terrorism officials regard as the most potent and disciplined of Islamic militant groups, even more so than al Qaeda – comes amid a growing confrontation over Iran’s nuclear program.

An Israeli or U.S. strike on Iran’s nuclear sites could prompt Hezbollah to change strategy, moving from surveillance and fund-raising in North America to launching retaliatory attacks on either country, several U.S. officials said. They spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss security matters.

Broader risks downloaded

Israel’s leaders, while acknowledging the likelihood of retaliation by Iran or its agents, have sometimes downplayed the risk of a broader conflict.

Iranian-inspired surveillance missions in the United States have been scattered over a period of years. But, when combined with a handful of recent attacks or plots around the world, they have contributed to an assessment within the U.S. government that considerable violence directed against U.S. targets – at overseas installations or businesses, or at American soil – could follow any strike on Iran’s nuclear program.

U.S. intelligence and law enforcement officials, along with private experts, say there is little doubt Hezbollah has an extensive network of supporters, fund-raisers and potential operatives in the United States.

A law enforcement official said that the New York Police Department, whose monitoring of Muslim communities has prompted political controversy, believes that between 200 and 300 Hezbollah sympathizers live in New York City. Between 10 and 20 of those are relatives of Hezbollah leaders or fighters who were killed in action, said the official.

The NYPD’s knowledge of Hezbollah’s infrastructure is sufficiently detailed that it has identified four Lebanese towns – Bint, Jbeil, Yanoun and Yatar – to which suspected sympathizers of the group have ties. At least a handful of people in New York connected with Hezbollah have also undergone military training in Lebanon, the official said.

A preliminary report issued by investigators for King, a New York Republican, said that pinpointing the number of Hezbollah operatives inside the United States was difficult because of the group’s operational security. The committee report nonetheless cited the estimates of “some officials” that the group “likely” has “several thousand sympathetic donors” in the United States as well as “hundreds” of operatives.

But other officials familiar with up-to-date U.S. intelligence on Hezbollah said there was a big difference between a Hezbollah “supporter” and someone who would be willing to engage in violent activity. The officials said such distinctions have been blurred in public discussions about the domestic threat the group allegedly poses.

Criminal cases

Over the years, U.S. federal authorities have brought numerous criminal cases against alleged Hezbollah operatives, most of them related to fund-raising or other support activity rather than plotting against U.S. targets.

The access to potential funding sources is one reason why Hezbollah has avoided targeting the United States or its interests, said Evan Kohlmann, an investigator who monitors militant websites for the government and private businesses.

“For the last 15 years, Hezbollah has regarded North America as a piggy bank,” Kohlmann said.

Reliable figures for Hezbollah’s fund-raising, which is done covertly, are not available.

Because the United States is such a critical source for funds and equipment such as night-vision devices that might be useful to its paramilitary operations, Kohlmann said, Hezbollah might be reluctant to embark on attacks inside the United States – even if prodded to do so by patrons in Iran. Attacks against U.S. targets overseas might be more likely, he said.

Kohlmann said that Hezbollah regards the U.S. as such an important supply point that the group supposedly has planted its own “procurement manager” somewhere in North America.

One factor heightening U.S. officials’ concern about Hezbollah-related attacks is the accumulation of accounts of alleged attempts by Iranian operatives to “case” potential U.S. targets.

According to a New York law enforcement source, there have been several notable incidents of this nature involving individuals who turned out to be accredited to Iran’s U.N. mission.

In a 2003 incident, New York police patrolmen observed a group of men videotaping the tracks out of the front window of a subway train traveling between Queens and Manhattan at 2 a.m.The Iranians were arrested, but later released after they produced diplomatic credentials. The law enforcement source said they were asked to leave the country.

In a 2006 incident, the captain of a sightseeing boat became suspicious after a group of Iranians taking his cruise along the East River broke into two smaller groups and started snapping pictures of the undersides of the Brooklyn and Manhattan bridges. The six men all turned out to be covered by diplomatic immunity, the law enforcement source said.

In September 2008, three more Iranians with diplomatic status were observed taking pictures of rail tracks going into Grand Central Station that are not routinely accessible to members of the public.

And in a 2010 incident, security personnel at a heliport near Wall Street observed a group of men who claimed to be affiliated with an Iranian broadcasting network taking pictures of the framework supporting the heliport deck which was cantilevered over the river.

A federal official said that similar surveillance incidents had been reported in other cities such as Los Angeles and Las Vegas. Targets under observation included nuclear power plants, tunnels and casinos.

Some of the officials said that anxieties about possible Hezbollah- or Iranian-related attacks were increased in the wake of an alleged plot by Iranian agents to kill the Saudi ambassador in Washington and other alleged Iranian plots uncovered recently in Thailand, India, Azerbaijan and Georgia.

 Source: alarabiya

Larijani Complains Against Ahmadinejad

0

 

Arash Bahmani

Following the remarks by Iran’s supreme leader on the need for greater coordination among the three branches of government, the head of the country’s parliament, the Majlis, announced that he had written a letter to ayatollah Khamenei complaining about Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s actions.

According to Fars news agency – a group close to the Revolutionary Guards – the letter is about the 2nd phase of the controversial subsidies program. No further details were provided by the news agency.

Larijani had earlier said on the Majlis floor that the government’s recent efforts in paying out new subsidies were “not compatible with the current conditions in the country, aside being expressly unlawful, and they would further deepen inflation in the country.” He also said that they would not help the unemployment problem, and added, “The Majlis cannot agree with programs that have not been prepared by specialists which will create hurricane of inflation, such as those that took place during the last few months and took away from people’s wealth” because “a proper implementation of the subsidies law along with some other problems in the allocation of banking facilities to the industries of the country have hurt production.”

The Speaker’s remarks came after Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had announced that targeted subsidies would continue “in the same manner as before” and added, “The next step in implementing the targeted subsidies are ready for implementation and all responsible authorities and governor generals must be ready to fully implement this phase” of the plan in the best possible way.

In a related development, the Jomhurie Eslami newspaper accused Ahmadinejad of engaging in four unlawful acts in recent days. “In the short span of 12 days, the d government has taken four unlawful actions which are: the head of the government refraining from responding to Majlis representatives questions; the appointment of the first defender in the Kahrizak prison to head the social welfare organization; adding to the subsidies without receiving authorization from Majlis, and; removing individuals from receiving subsidies without getting their approval first,” it wrote. Jomhurie Eslami is a hardline newspaper closely associated with the supreme leader, ayatollah Khamenei.

This new issue between the Majlis and Ahmadinejad comes as parliament is busy discussing summoning the minister of labor for his appointment of Saeed Mortezavi to head the social welfare organization. Ahmadinejad had earlier said in an act of defiance that if the Majlis summoned the minister of labor, he would appoint Mortezavi as the caretaker of the ministry.

 Source: roozonline

Afghanistan Senate Accuses Iran’s Ahmadinejad Of Interference

0

 

By Mina Habib

Afghanistan senators have accused Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of interfering in their country’s affairs, after he called on NATO to withdraw troops immediately and fund economic reconstruction instead.

Ahmadinejad made the remarks on March 26 during a regional conference on economic cooperation with Afghanistan, held in Tajikistan’s capital Dushanbe.

“The times of imperialism have long since passed,” he said, according to AFP news agency, warning that “those who do not learn from the mistakes of history will be punished”.

Ahmadinejad said NATO must end its “occupation” and instead allocate 25 per cent of its annual budget – or five per cent of member states’ annual defence spending – on rebuilding Afghanistan’s economy over the next decade.

For its part, he said, Iran would offer technical and economic assistance to Kabul, including investment, healthcare and infrastructure projects, Reuters news agency reported.

Afghan president Hamid Karzai, his Pakistani counterpart Asif Ali Zardari and Imomali Rahmon of Tajikistan also attended the conference, as did a United States delegation led by Assistant Secretary of State Robert Blake, who walked out during Ahmadinejad’s speech.

The Iranian leader’s outspoken comments received a frosty reception at theMeshrano Jirga, or upper house of parliament, inKabul.

The senate’s 40-member Reform and Justice Group said the remarks were dangerous and irresponsible.

“Iran wants to fuel war in this country once again and reduce it to ruins,” the senators said in a statement.

They now plan to issue a formal request to Iranian officials to refrain from commenting on Afghanistan’s domestic affairs.

Amin Farjad, a counsellor at the Iranian embassy in Kabul, said Ahmadinejad’s comments should not be viewed as foreign meddling, and that he was entitled to air his opinions.

“It is true that on matters like the US and NATO presence, the main decision makers are the people of Afghanistan and their representatives. However, others have a right to comment,” Farjad told IWPR.

The international troop presence is a worry to Iran and the rest of the region, he said, adding, “We cannot remain indifferent to this presence because it poses security threats.”

As evidence, Farjad cited a US surveillance drone captured by the Iranian military in December 2011.

Tehransaid at the time that it hijacked the unmanned plane’s electronics and steered it to the ground after it flew over 200 kilometres into Iranian airspace, according to the BBC.

USofficials said the drone was monitoring Iran’s nuclear programme, and crashed after a malfunction.

Afghan political analyst Wahid Mozhda told IWPR that Ahmadinejad’s speech was probably intended for domestic consumption, to demonstrate to hardliners that he was taking a strong line.

The president “attacks the US at every opportunity, thereby attempting to maintain his popularity among Iranians, particularly the clergy,” Mozhda said.

Ahmadinejad has denounced the occupation and called for the withdrawal of US troops on several occasions.

For their part, NATO officials have accused Iran of providing weapons to the Taleban, an allegation Tehran denies.

Officials at Karzai’s office declined to discuss Ahmadinejad’s latest speech.

Mozhda believes Karzai may be reserving comment because he is wary of provoking Iran into open support for resistance to his government in western Afghanistan, where the two countries share a border nearly 1,000 km long.

US officials may share this concern, Mozhda added.

“The Americans, too, agree with Hamid Karzai’s soft policy on Iran because they do not want tensions to expand,” he said.

Some Afghan analysts believe Iran is already heavily involved in a proxy struggle against the US in Afghanistan. Iranian-US ties have remained severed since the 1979 Islamic revolution, and tensions are rising over Iran’s nuclear programme.

Political analyst Fazel Rahman Oria claimed Iran was providing significant support to the Taleban and allied groups and had spies at high levels of government and parliament.

“This front has been established and is effectively in operation,” he added.

Oria said that despite Ahmadinejad’s comments, Iran may be happy to see NATO troops bogged down in Afghanistan where they continue to be worn down by insurgents.

On the streets of Kabul, some accused Ahmadinejad of undermining Afghan sovereignty, while others shared his concern about foreign troops.

University student Nurullah said the Iranian leader had no right to weigh in on Afghan affairs.

“We are an independent country with our own president. We can tell the Americans and NATO whatever we want to on our own,” he said.

Nurullah said Karzai was unable to stand up to Ahmadinejad because he had accepted Iranian funding.

The Afghan president admitted in October 2010 that his chief of staff collected “bags of money” containing hundreds of thousands of euros from the Iranian government each year, according to The Guardian. Karzai told a press conference that the money was used to pay his office expenses, and that he was grateful for the support.

Hussein Ali, a construction worker, told IWPR that if Iran really cared about Afghanistan, it should treat the Afghan refugees it hosts better, and stop blocking fuel supplies during the winter.

Others, however, believe Iran’s criticism of the NATO presence is valid.

Masuma, a schoolteacher, said US troops had killed large numbers of Afghan civilians over the past decade, including the 17 shot dead by an American soldier in Kandahar province on March 11.

“Iranians, Americans and Pakistanis are all the same to us,” she said. “None of them has ever refrained from oppressing the Afghans.”