Home Blog Page 3

Khamenei advises tactical retreat, but warns against trusting the West

0

In his characteristic ambiguous style, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei hinted at a willingness to “cooperate” with the West while warning the government about the dangers of placing trust in them.

“Let us not place our hopes in the enemy, nor should we await their approval for our plans. This does not preclude engaging with them when necessary—there’s no harm. However, do not rely on them, and trust in the enemy is misplaced,” Khamenei said on Tuesday.

In his first meeting with President Masoud Pezeshkian’s cabinet, Khamenei fueled speculation of a possible shift toward a softer foreign policy, though not without his trademark dose of skepticism.

“No plan is without its challenges,” he remarked. “For some, the instinctive response to obstacles is a retreat, but this is a flawed approach. Instead, one must either overcome the hurdle or find a way to circumvent it. While there may be times when a tactical retreat becomes necessary after all avenues have been explored, it is crucial not to abandon one’s position or resolve at the first sign of difficulty,” Khamenei added.

Since Masoud Pezeshkian’s election, murmurs of dialogue with the West have grown, signaling a potential shift toward negotiations on nuclear issues. While Tehran’s rhetoric fluctuates, it remains steadfast on red lines like terrorism sponsorship. How they intend to lift crippling sanctions while maintaining these positions is yet to be seen.

Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei at the center during the first meeting with Masoud Pezeshkian’s cabinet, August 27, 2024.

Two weeks ago, Khamenei had adopted a more aggressive yet still ambiguous tone. He condemned the “enemy’s psychological warfare” intended to dissuade Iran and warned that any retreat—whether military, political, or economic—that lacks “tactical prudence” would invite “divine wrath,” as cautioned in the Holy Quran.

At Tuesday’s meeting, Khamenei also confirmed he had vetted the ministers well before their parliamentary approval.

“The President sought my counsel in selecting the ministers. I endorsed several, emphasized the importance of others, and remained neutral on many whom I was unfamiliar with,” Khamenei said on Tuesday.

Last week, in his final address before the cabinet vote, Pezeshkian revealed that Khamenei approved every minister and personally persuaded at least one hesitant candidate to step up.

In the first meeting of the new cabinet, Khamenei confirmed the claim but with a nuanced twist, noting that while he had reviewed the list, he was unfamiliar with many of the nominees—this subtle remark left room for future maneuvering, a hallmark of Khamenei’s strategic ambiguity.

Historically, it has been understood that Khamenei plays a decisive role in selecting key ministers—specifically those of Intelligence, Interior, Defense, and Foreign Affairs. Yet, no sitting president had previously admitted to such direct pre-approval.

Pezeshkian’s openness, paired with Khamenei’s carefully measured response, has led to renewed scrutiny of the system’s democratic pretensions. Some reformist observers speculate that Pezeshkian might be laying the groundwork to shift blame to Khamenei if his administration falters. However, Khamenei has never shied away from disowning those he’s endorsed—most notably former President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, whom Khamenei staunchly defended in the face of the 2009 protests, despite widespread allegations of electoral fraud.

Artistic Exchange Builds Bridges Between Düsseldorf and Haifa, and Beyond

Düsseldorf, August 18, 2024 – As I stood in Paul-Spiegel-Platz, in front of the historic synagogue, I couldn’t help but feel the profound significance of the event unfolding before me. The unveiling of Druze artist Sam Halaby’s striking cartwheeler figure was more than just an artistic display—it was a powerful symbol of unity, hope, and the enduring bond between the sister cities of Düsseldorf and Haifa.

Halaby, hailing from Daliyat al-Karmel in Israel, is known as a “hunter of colors,” and witnessing his work firsthand was an experience I will not soon forget. His ability to transform ordinary spaces into vibrant, immersive environments is nothing short of magical. The cartwheeler figure he presented, crafted from lightweight polystyrene and bursting with colour, radiated a message of love and positivity that resonated deeply with everyone present. This artwork, commissioned by the Jewish Community of Düsseldorf and brought to life in collaboration with Radschläger Düsseldorf, is a testament to the deep-rooted cultural connections that exist between these two cities.

The unveiling of Druze artist Sam Halaby’s vibrant cartwheeler figure at Paul-Spiegel-Platz was not just an artistic display; it symbolized the enduring bond between Düsseldorf and Haifa and offered a beacon of hope amidst global challenges.

For a long time, I had been contemplating how to transform my parents’ home into a museum to honor their artistic legacy. Then, a chance encounter with Sam Halaby on the streets of Düsseldorf turned out to be nothing short of serendipitous. While buying coffee, I noticed Sam from his promotional posters, and this led to an immediate and heartfelt conversation. Sam, upon learning that I was Iranian, expressed his own Druze heritage and we quickly found a deep connection. It felt almost like a miracle that our shared background in art and our personal histories converged so meaningfully at that moment.

Sam Halaby’s story is one of remarkable resilience and emotional depth. Born as the tenth child in a traditional Druze family in Daliyat al-Karmel, Israel, Sam was surrounded by love from his nine older sisters. His mother, Emily, recognized his extraordinary artistic talent from a young age, nurturing his abilities and attributing them to his previous incarnations. Her death, while a profound personal loss, inspired Sam to channel his grief into his art, creating works that resonate deeply with themes of love, memory, and healing.

The event was a powerful testament to the role of art in bridging divides. Commissioned by the Jewish Community of Düsseldorf and created in collaboration with Radschläger Düsseldorf, Halaby’s cartwheeler figure, crafted from durable polystyrene and adorned with vibrant colors, symbolized a message of love and positivity. The artwork reflects the deep-rooted cultural connections between Düsseldorf and Haifa and serves as a symbol of hope and unity.

Dignitaries and notable guests gathered to celebrate this cultural exchange. Düsseldorf’s Mayor Joseph Hinkel expressed heartfelt gratitude to everyone involved, including Sam Halaby Tanya Rubinstein-Horowitz, Dr Horowitz  and Bert Römgens  whose collaboration brought the project to life. Mayor Hinkel underscored the importance of Paul-Spiegel-Platz and the Düsseldorf Jewish synagogue as the ideal settings for this event, emphasizing how Halaby’s vibrant work resonates with Düsseldorf’s commitment to fostering international relationships through art.

What a beautiful and meaningful image! It seems that this moment showcases a blend of art and peace. The act of Mayor Joseph dipping his finger in blue paint and placing a blue heart on Sam Halabi’s t-shirt symbolizes a message of solidarity and hope.

The color blue typically signifies tranquility and peace, while the heart acts as a symbol of love and unity.

When Sam Halabi finished his painting on Mayor Joseph’s shirt, the mayor dipped his finger in blue paint and placed a blue heart on Sam Halabi’s t-shirt. I was filming this image and in my mind, I was composing a story of this program for the people of Iran and Israel about peace and art.

I see a stark difference between a mayor in a civilized country and the mayor of Tehran, who might even kill his own wife with impunity. This is the disparity between nations with a Republic of Islamic governance and what we aspire to change. Our hope is to evolve in a manner similar to England’s transition—from the Cromwellian period to a constitutional monarchy, with Prince Reza Pahlavi leading the way.

Bert Römgens, Director of Jewish Düsseldorf and from the Alexander-Bederov Center Library, represented the rich Jewish heritage celebrated by the artwork. He also added his personal touch to the painting, embodying the collaborative spirit of the event. During the event, I reflected on the broader historical and geopolitical context that influenced the occasion.

The current regional instability, particularly following the escalation of violence on October 7, 2023, highlights the need for unity and understanding. As an Iranian-born journalist, I spoke about Iran’s complex relationship with Israel and the Iranian diaspora’s separation from the current government. Many Iranians, including those of us in the diaspora, have distanced ourselves from the Iranian regime due to its policies and actions, which stand in stark contrast to our values of peace and cultural exchange.

Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi’s recent speech provided a powerful context for this dialogue. Addressing a global audience, Pahlavi warned against the dangers posed by radical ideologies, including Marxism and Islamism, which have threatened Western civilization and previously devastated Iran. His call for a partnership based on shared values and mutual interests resonates strongly with the spirit of this cultural exchange. Pahlavi’s emphasis on unity and vigilance against extremism echoes the themes of hope and collaboration embodied in Halaby’s artwork.

Oded Horowitz, Chairman of the Jewish Community, spoke with deep emotion about the significance of the project, particularly in light of ongoing regional conflicts and the plight of hostages. “We thought it was a fitting gesture in these challenging times,” Horowitz remarked, highlighting how Halaby’s artwork offers a much-needed message of hope and unity.

Mrs. Rivka Young from founder of the Run for Lives added her personal touch to the painting, embodying the collaborative spirit of the event. She spoke passionately about the need for international solidarity to support hostages and promote peace, reflecting the sentiments of many attendees who were moved by the occasion.

Halaby’s artistic project, coordinated by the Cultural Office under Angelique Tracik, allowed him to share his vision of “limitless creativity and positive energy” with a new audience. As Halaby began painting the cartwheeler figure, he created a dynamic piece filled with vibrant colors. Mayor Hinkel, dressed impeccably in a light suit, also contributed to the painting, symbolizing the spirit of collaboration and unity.

Following the exhibition, attendees gathered for a demonstration in the main streets of Düsseldorf, organized by Rivka Young, founder of the Run for Lives initiative and a passionate advocate for peace and unity. The event was a profound display of solidarity, featuring both Iranian and Israeli flags side by side, along with images of Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi and posters advocating for a positive relationship between Iran and Israel, highlighting their historical ties.

The demonstration included a deeply moving moment where we collectively honored the hostages and expressed our support through heartfelt speeches and symbolic displays. Every Sunday, a significant number of Iranians participate in these demonstrations, marching through the streets to show their solidarity with the hostages and their commitment to peace. The presence of Iranian flags and images of Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi further symbolizes the desire for reconciliation and a brighter future for our nations.

Displaying these symbols together was a profoundly emotional and symbolic conclusion to an event that celebrated the power of art in bridging cultural and political divides. It underscored our shared commitment to reconciliation and peace, serving as a powerful reminder of the strength found in unity during times of adversity.

The completed cartwheeler figure not only highlights Sam Halaby’s artistic brilliance but also reinforces the strong bond between Düsseldorf and Haifa. As the vibrant colors of the cartwheeler illuminate Paul-Spiegel-Platz, they stand as a testament to the transformative power of cultural exchange in building bridges between communities, even amid global challenges. This poignant and visually striking artwork celebrates the enduring friendship and artistic collaboration between these two cities, while echoing a call for unity and vigilance against radical ideologies.

The spirit of unity and peace was also evident last year when Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi visited Haifa and prayed for harmony between the Iranian and Israeli peoples. His visit and prayers highlighted the potential for friendship and mutual respect between our nations.

In this spirit, I extend my heartfelt wishes for peace and love to all people, particularly to the Iranian and Israeli Jewish communities. May our shared humanity guide us towards understanding, cooperation, and a brighter future for everyone.

As an Iranian who believes in Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi and the Cyrus Accord, and who is convinced that Iran’s salvation lies in peace and friendship between the people of Iran and Israel, I had a deeply impactful experience. For the first time, I participated in a ceremony alongside patriotic Iranians who, every week, quietly and with dignity, stand as champions of peace and friendship with the people of Israel. These individuals, without seeking recognition, attend these events with a steadfast belief in the power of peace.

This profound experience inspired me to write about my journey to Düsseldorf as a journalist. In this city, I encountered a community that firmly believes in reclaiming Iran through peace and friendship. They are committed to fighting for the people of Iran and, if necessary, sacrificing their lives to liberate their homeland from its adversaries. Their dedication showed me that there is still hope for a bright and free future for Iran—a future where people live together in peace and harmony.

P.S

Sam Halaby is a distinguished Druze artist from Daliyat al-Karmel, Israel, whose rise to fame is as inspiring as his art. .

Halaby’s work is celebrated for its vibrant use of color and deep emotional resonance, themes that often reflect his rich cultural heritage and personal experiences. His artistry has gained recognition far beyond his native Israel, with major pieces displayed in prestigious venues worldwide, including the Israeli Presidential Residence. Halaby’s success has not only earned him a place among Israel’s most respected contemporary artists but has also made him a cultural ambassador, bridging the gap between his Druze roots and the broader art world.

Halaby’s latest exhibit in a Jaffa gallery, a moving tribute to his mother, underscores the personal and cultural influences that have shaped his work. Through his art, he continues to challenge societal norms, inspiring others in his community and beyond to pursue their creative dreams. Halaby’s journey is a testament to the power of perseverance and the universal language of art.

Saba Khoi

Publishing received articles does not necessarily mean confirming all their opinions

 

Iran working to form ‘new eastern terror front,’ Israel warns

0

Israel’s foreign minister has warned that Iran is attempting to open a new Eastern front in its proxy war against the Jewish state, with the IRGC’s support, targeting Jordan and the West Bank.

In a post on X, Israel Katz said that as Iran’s proxies in Gaza and Lebanon continue to fight on Israel’s northern and southern borders, Iran is now trying to destabilize Jordan and the Palestinian Authority (PA)-controlled West Bank.

Katz stated that the Islamic Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) is working with Hamas operatives in Lebanon to smuggle weapons into Jordan.

“A serious and dangerous situation is unfolding as Iran works to establish a new eastern terror front against Israel’s major population centers,” he said.

“Iranian Revolutionary Guard units are collaborating with Hamas operatives in Lebanon to smuggle weapons and funds into Jordan with the aim of destabilizing the regime.”

He said that from Jordan, weapons are smuggled across the eastern border, “flooding” the West Bank, particularly refugee camps, with dangerous weapons and large sums of money, “aiming to create a pro-Iranian Islamic terror front, as they have done in Gaza, Lebanon, and other areas, targeting Tel Aviv and Israel’s major population centers”.

The foreign minister said: “The Iranian axis of evil today effectively controls refugee camps in Judea and Samaria [West Bank] through its proxies, leaving the Palestinian Authority powerless to act. We must take terror hubs like the Jenin refugee camp and carry out a thorough operational campaign to dismantle the terror infrastructure in the camp.”

David Schenker, a Taube Senior Fellow at The Washington Institute said Tehran is aiming to destabilize Jordan, one of Israel’s Arab allies, by inciting protests against its ruling Hashemite dynasty. He said Iran is also increasing drug and weapons smuggling through the kingdom in a bid to overthrow the monarchy and turn it into another Iran proxy state.

He said there’s a strong Hamas presence in the West Bank despite being under Palestinian Authority control.

“The Iranians are incredibly incensed by Jordan’s Western orientation and the fact that Jordan has a peace treaty with Israel,” said Schenker, who was a former Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs.

Jordan has been at peace with its neighbor Israel since 1994. Amman also maintains close ties to Washington, and has a role in administering Muslim holy sites in Jerusalem.

“Iran is interfering in Jordanian internal politics,” he said.

Jordan’s Reaction: Diplomacy vs. Reality

Katz, Israel’s Foreign Minister wrote on X that “the construction of the eastern barrier along the border with Jordan must be expedited to prevent the smuggling of weapons from Jordan into Israel, which threatens both the Jordanian regime and the State of Israel”.

Jordanian Foreign Minister, Ayman Safadi, posted to X, seemingly in response to Katz, calling his tweet ‘lies’ and taking aim at Israel’s war in Gaza since the Iran-backed Hamas invasion of October 7. In a single day, Hamas killed over 1,100 mostly civilians and took over 250 more hostage, sparking the longest Gaza war since Hamas took control of the strip.

“No amount of disinformation by radical Israeli officials spreading lies, including about Jordan, will change the fact that Israel’s continued aggression on Gaza, its violation of international law and the rights of the Palestinian people are the biggest threat to regional security,” wrote Safadi.

Jordan’s top diplomat made a rare visit to Iran on August 4, underscoring Amman’s sensitive position, the first official visit of a Jordanian to Tehran in decades.

Despite the public outcry from the foreign minister, Jordan is a key ally for its Jewish neighbor. That was made clear when Jordan was part of a global coalition to thwart more than 350 missiles and drones aimed directly at Israel from Iran in April.

The Islamic Republic launched its first direct attack on Israel’s soil in response to an apparent Israeli strike on an Iranian consulate in Syria on April 1 that killed two IRGC generals and several senior officials.

Almost all of the missiles were intercepted by Israel and a US-led coalition including France, Jordan and Britain. It is believed that Saudi Arabia provided intelligence reports about Iran’s plans to the US.

While Jordan must speak out against Israel in public, its diplomatic relationship with the Jewish state remains strong, not least in the area of security.

Nearly 60 percent of Jordan’s population is of Palestinian origin, putting the country in a precarious position when it comes to supporting Israel publicly given the backdrop of the war against Hamas.

On Episode 10 of Iran International’s English podcast ‘Eye for Iran’Israeli Knesset member Amit Halevi, said Jordan and other neighboring Arab countries like Saudi Arabia appear one way diplomatically for their populace, but cooperate with Israel for their own security and well-being.

Halevi said that Iran’s attempts and activities to undermine the Jordanian regime have “become high level in recent years”.

Dr. Walid Phares, an expert in foreign policy and the author of ‘Iran, an Imperialist Republic, and US Policy’, told Iran International smuggling arms through Jordan is not new. Formed over the years, it has been facilitated since Iran effectively took over areas of Iraq, which shares a long border with Jordan.

Jordan also shares a large border with Saudi Arabia, which impacts not just the Saudis but the Kuwaitis and the UAE.

“That passage or that chunk of Jordan is really very important strategically,” he said, a possible means for terrorist groups and militias to use, should there a wider regional war occur between Iran and Israel.

“If Jordan is destabilized or [was to] fall entirely or partially, either to the Iran backed militias or to the Muslim Brotherhood, we are in deep trouble internationally,” said Phares, who served as a national security advisor to US Presidential nominees.

Iran bides its time, but reiterates right to retaliate against Israel

Iran has branded warnings from France, Britain, and Germany against attacking Israel as “illogical and excessive,” asserting that it “doesn’t need permission to retaliate” for the killing of Hamas’s Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran.

On Monday, the leaders of France, Germany, and the UK issued a joint statement urging Iran and its allies to exercise restraint and avoid actions that could further inflame regional tensions or undermine efforts to secure a ceasefire in Gaza amid the war and facilitate the release of the remaining more than 100 hostages held by Iran-backed Hamas.

Nasser Kanaani, the spokesperson for Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, asserted on Tuesday that the “apathy” of Western nations has enabled Israel to perpetrate “a myriad of international crimes, including genocide and war crimes,” all while remaining “unpunished” referring to the Gaza war.

The latest statement warned Tehran and its network of regional militias that “They will bear responsibility for actions that jeopardize this opportunity for peace and stability.” Meanwhile, Iran-backed Hamas is threatening to boycott the latest round of ceasefire talks amid Iran’s looming attack.

Also in a call on Monday, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer urged Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian to avoid attacking Israel, emphasizing that war serves no one’s interests.

Pezeshkian reiterated Iran’s right to retaliate, under pressure to publicly maintain the Supreme Leader’s position, even though behind the scenes he too worries for the impact such an escalation would have inside Iran and has implored Ali Khamenei to rethink the operation.

Iran’s President acknowledged that war is never in anyone’s interest, yet affirmed the inherent right of nations to “punitive responses against an aggressor,” according to the official news agency, IRNA.

In parallel, on Tuesday, Israel’s Army Radio reported that Israel has recently conveyed to the US and several European nations that any direct aggression from Tehran would prompt an Israeli strike on Iranian territory.

The report, though unsourced, indicated that Israel underscored its determination to retaliate against Iran, even if no Israeli casualties result.

It is almost two weeks since Hamas’s political leader Ismail Haniyeh was killed in Tehran. In April, it was also two weeks before Iran undertook its first direct attack on Israel following an alleged Israeli airstrike on the Iranian consulate in Syria.

Two IRGC commanders were killed along with several other senior figures, leading to a barrage of over 350 drones, rockets and missiles fired towards Israel. Israel and a US-led coalition intercepted the majority of the onslaught.

On Tuesday, Asghar Abbasgholizadeh, the commander of the Ashura Headquarters of the IRGC said, “On the surface, it seems too late for a response and revenge, but the enemy endures significant pressure by waiting. We are awaiting the command of the Supreme Leader, whether for patience and perseverance or retaliation.”

Reuters reported on Tuesday that a potential ceasefire agreement in Gaza, emerging from anticipated talks this week, would deter Iran from directly retaliating against Israel for the assassination of Hamas’s political leader.

Citing senior Iranian security officials, Reuters wrote that if the Gaza negotiations falter or if Iran perceives Israel as stalling, Iran, along with allies such as Hezbollah, is prepared to launch a direct attack. The sources did not specify how long Iran would wait for the talks to progress before taking action.

However, while it remains unclear if Hamas will attend the talks amid demands that Israel holds fire while they continue, a demand that Israel will not comply with, global powers remain keen to avert a crisis.

Khamenei warns of ‘divine wrath’ if Iran backs down amid Israel tensions

Iran’s Supreme Leader Khamenei condemned “enemy psychological warfare” aimed at forcing the country to reconsider retaliation against Israel in the wake of the killing of the Hamas political leader in Tehran.

Speaking on Wednesday, Khamenei underscored that any non-tactical retreat—be it military, political, or economic—invites “divine wrath,” as per the Holy Quran.

Ismail Haniyeh, the political chief of Iran-backed Hamas, was killed in Tehran last month while attending the inauguration ceremony of the new president. He had boasted of his freedom of movement as he strolled around Tehran just hours before his assassination.

Iran has subsequently been biding its time as it weighs retaliation. “Governments that yield to the demands of today’s dominant powers, regardless of the size or strength of the nations they represent, could defy these pressures if they draw on the strength of their people and accurately assess their adversaries’ true, unembellished capabilities,” Khamenei said.

He further criticized the longstanding habit of “exaggerating” enemy capabilities to instill fear, pointing to what he described as US, British, and Israeli efforts since the 1979 Islamic revolution in Iran.

Meanwhile, Iran has been leveraging its own psychological tactics, building suspense by threatening retaliation over Haniyeh’s killing, yet refraining from immediate action.

Some believe that the Islamic government is apprehensive about escalation but uses the threat of an attack on Israel to get concessions from the United States, which has committed itself to preventing a wider conflict. On Thursday, President Joe Biden indicated that a Gaza ceasefire can prevent Iran’s potential retaliation, while Hamas can use a cessation in hostilities to regroup and avoid a complete defeat.

As Western powers caution Iran against retaliation, urging restraint to prevent escalating regional tensions and to facilitate the release of over 100 hostages held by Iran-backed Hamas amid the ongoing conflict in Gaza, Iranian authorities have dismissed the warnings as “illogical and excessive.”

Tehran has asserted its right to retaliate for the killing of the Hamas political chief in Tehran without seeking external permission.

Nasser Kanaani, the spokesperson for Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, criticized Western nations for their “apathy,” claiming it has allowed Israel to commit “a myriad of international crimes, including genocide and war crimes,” in the Gaza war, all while remaining “unpunished.”

Meanwhile, Iran-backed Hamas is threatening to boycott the latest ceasefire talks as the possibility of an Iranian retaliation looms.

Iran’s new president, Masoud Pezeshkian, also has reaffirmed Iran’s right to retaliate, publicly aligning with the Supreme Leader’s stance, though it is alleged that he privately expressed concerns about the impact of escalation and urged Khamenei to reconsider.

Iran’s President acknowledged that war is undesirable but affirmed the right to “punitive responses against an aggressor,” according to IRNA.

Meanwhile, Israel’s Army Radio reported that Israel warned the US and European nations that any direct aggression from Tehran would trigger an Israeli strike on Iranian territory, emphasizing their intent to retaliate, even without Israeli casualties.

IRGC-linked newspaper censures president over cabinet selection

0

An IRGC-linked newspaper has criticized President Masoud Pezeshkian for the “consequences” of his repeated statements that Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei will be heavily involved in the appointment of his cabinet.

Pezeshkian, who is expected to present his cabinet to Parliament for a vote of confidence in the coming days, possibly on Sunday, has, along with his newly appointed parliamentary liaison Shahram Dabiri, emphasized that he will consult with Khamenei and secure his “approval” for the nominees before submitting them to Parliament.

Pezeshkian has consistently emphasized that his policies will be shaped by the overarching directives set by Khamenei. He also insists that his administration’s performance should be judged on how closely officials adhere to these guidelines and how effectively they utilize the resources at their disposal.

However, an editorial note in Javan newspaper Wednesday said that Pezeshkian’s statements about getting Khamenei’s approval “can provide excuses to certain people to avoid bearing responsibility for ministers’ performance” and to shift “responsibility and [need for] accountability” to Khamenei.

It has long been understood that no president can form a government without Khamenei’s approval of individual candidates. However, Pezeshkian has taken an unprecedented step by openly emphasizing this reality, making it clear that Khamenei also shares responsibility for the administration’s performance. This tactic sets him apart from his predecessors, who typically kept such matters behind closed doors.

“Such an approach, obviously, cannot be right neither politically nor ethically,” the Javan editorial charged. It also maintained that Khamenei does not get involved in “executive affairs” or “interfere in other entities’ activities” claiming that he even avoids interfering when directly requested to express his opinion.

Similar accusations are widely made by hardliners and ultra-hardliners on social media against Pezeshkian and his right-hand man, Mohammad-Javad Zarif, who he appointed to the newly created position of ‘strategic deputy’ last week to the huge disappointment of his critics.

“No president’s cabinet should be evaluated on the basis of the approval or disapproval of the Leader of the Revolution,” the Javan editorial argued while stressing that the responsibility for the performance of government officials only lies with the president.

“Opposition to and criticism of no minister can be taken as opposing the Leader,” Javan wrote referring to the very high possibility of strong opposition of the hardliner-dominated parliament in the review process of some of Pezeshkian’s proposed candidates.

However, while tightly controlling the core of the regime, Khamenei usually pretends he is not involved in the decisions and actions of the executive branch and tries to avoid responsibility for failures.

“We are certain that appointment to these positions will not be possible without consultation with the Supreme Leader,” Alaeddin Boroujerdi, a veteran conservative lawmaker and former head of the Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, said last week.

Pezeshkian is the first Iranian president to inform the public of such a step in the formation of the cabinet and to say he would discuss not only candidates for these five positions but also all others with Khamenei.

Javan’s editorial also referred to “some pessimists” who believe that Pezeshkian’s parliamentary deputy highlighted the Leader’s involvement in the selection of the ministers to put pressure on the Parliament and limit lawmakers’ independence.

Pundits say highlighting Khamenei’s role in setting guidelines for the government and shedding light on his deep involvement in the selection of its officials is indeed a step towards transparency and would allow the president to be held only responsible for what he has freely and independently chosen to do.

The Geopolitical Implications of Ismail Haniyeh’s Assassination

0

It is undeniable that the assassination of Ismail Haniyeh involved cooperation from high-ranking security officials of the Islamic Republic. A member of the National Security Commission of the Parliament has said: “The Israelis have a network of influence inside Tehran and Iran. Malicious elements cooperate with them and have defined themselves within the ‘Mossad’ network.”
According to state news agencies, this member of the National Security Commission emphasized that a more precise and logical level of protection should have been observed, adding: “It is said that a micro-drone carrying a missile was shot towards ‘Haniyeh’s’ room.”

However, this fact is secondary in this specific case because Haniyeh’s elimination is intended to aid a project by Netanyahu and the Israeli government to navigate a serious crisis. The question is, who benefits from such a scenario? Is it only Netanyahu?

Despite being one of the highest-ranking officials of Hamas, Haniyeh pursued a different political approach to achieving peace. His unique stance within the Axis of Resistance against the Assad regime also kept his position fragile. Therefore, his elimination has not caused serious political and organizational damage to Hamas.

Yes, the killings are part of Israel’s brutal apartheid colonial policy and its ongoing genocidal campaign against the Palestinians, for which Israel has always been condemned.

But, Netanyahu seeks to expand the war, and killing Haniyeh in Qatar, Egypt, or especially Turkey, which is a NATO member, would not have served this purpose. However, Haniyeh’s elimination in Tehran could lead to a major war or at least a prolonged cold war, which could significantly help Netanyahu overcome the current crisis. Even if the Islamic regime in Tehran opts for a limited operation and refrains from entering a war (which reformists refer to as national rationality), Netanyahu, by killing Haniyeh in the heart of Tehran and eliminating other senior commanders of Hamas and Hezbollah, has managed to shift the balance in favor of Israel overall and strengthen his position within Israel.

At the same time, Iran’s former ambassador to India and special representative for the Caspian Sea region said in an interview: “The fall of Israel would deal a severe blow to US and the Westerners. They must face the mistake they have made. Instead of allocating a part of Germany for a Jewish state after Hitler’s fall, they freed Europe and the West from the Jews and created a large land and base among Muslim countries.”

He says the assassination of Ismail Haniyeh happened in the capital city and in one of our important political centers. That is, after the inauguration incident, we can say there was a surprise in the country. Overall, we had a statement from the leadership and then a statement from the IRGC, both of which are worth studying. The rest of the reactions to this assassination are just slogans, while they should respect the governance.

The Islamic Republic and Zionism are two wings of imperialism that have been used against the left and socialism in the Middle East. The conflict between these two, however, is important for creating a power balance in the Middle East, especially now that China is entering the region with increasing strength. However, the ongoing tensions are also significant for China in maintaining the North Transit Corridor. While China plays the role of a peacemaker in the Middle East, it also benefits from these tensions.

The Islamic Republic seems to be under pressure to attack Israel. But the language of the officials is something else, which they have not changed since October 7. Moving towards war makes the situation inside Iran more conducive to even bloodier repression. This narrative is being broadcast on national television, with efforts to prepare the minds of the restless and protesting Iranian society ongoing.

If, for the first time in the history of the Islamic Republic, a labor activist in Iran (Sharifeh Mohammadi) faces a death sentence for forming a labor union because officials have interpreted this as an attempt to overthrow the regime, and a social worker (Pakhshan Azizi) also faces a death sentence merely for collaborating with local communities in Rojava, it is clear what a state of war would bring upon that society.

Internal conflicts within the regime could lead Iran into a dark scenario where factions within the regime move from dividing and plundering the country to physically eliminating each other and monopolizing power.

Iranian society, with the onset of the Zhina/Mahsa revolution, has entered a phase where, despite repression, it has imposed significant social achievements on the Islamic Republic. The Islamic Republic cannot return to its previous state without entering into a war.

Conclusion

The assassination of Ismail Haniyeh, while aiding Netanyahu’s agenda, has broader implications for the Middle East. It underscores the fragile nature of political alliances and the continuous struggle for power in the region. This act serves Israel’s strategy to navigate its crises but also pushes the Islamic Republic towards potentially catastrophic decisions.

The internal repression within Iran could intensify, and the conflict between imperialist forces might escalate, impacting regional stability. Iranian society’s progress amidst the Zhina/Mahsa revolution highlights that despite severe repression, significant social changes are occurring. However, the specter of war looms large, threatening to undo these gains and plunge the region into deeper turmoil.

Tehran responds as viral video of hijab enforcement sparks outrage

ranian police have blamed a teenage girl for defying officers in a viral video showing her being violently arrested for not wearing a mandatory hijab.

Though they admitted their actions fell short of “standards”, the social media backlash to the video was so intense that the Tehran Military Prosecutor also responded, stating that the video was meant solely for judicial purposes and should not have been released to the public.

He also said that the officers have been identified and legally summoned for their behaviour.

On Tuesday, the reformist website Ensaf News published the video which shows two unveiled teenage girls in a street in northern Tehran. A police van pulls up, and officers jump out, violently pulling the girls from the street and taking them to the van. One of the girls fervently tries to resist, but both are ultimately taken in.

The outlet noted that the video dates back to June and featured an interview with the mother of the 14-year-old girl who resisted the police. The mother described finding her daughter in a dire physical condition at the morality police detention center.

Ensaf News, quoting the mother, reported that “the officers slammed my daughter’s head against a power box and, after forcibly placing her into the van, continued to beat her … I found my daughter with a bruised face, swollen lips, a discolored neck, torn clothes, and she could barely speak”.

“Her eyes were swollen shut from excessive crying,” she recounted.

The report also revealed that the mother had considered filing a complaint since her daughter is under legal age. However, she was discouraged by warnings that doing so would involve the security and intelligence police and would be “costly.”

The authorities also told her that two fingers of a female officer were “broken” and suggested that if she refrains from filing a complaint, they could request the officer not to press charges.

Reza Shafakhah, the lawyer representing the girls, wrote on X that he informed the judge that the officers had no legal grounds to detain his client for not adhering to the compulsory hijab.

The judge replied that it was not an arrest but an “invitation to the police station for administrative purposes.” Shafakhah posted a video stating, “The video below illustrates how the officers issue these so-called invitations.”

Mohammad Aghazadeh, a seasoned journalist in Iran, also wrote on X that the behavior only “plants the seeds of hatred that can only result in rebellion and rage.”

Journalist Aida Ghajar wrote on X that the violence against the teenager “transcends the issue of women’s rights and compulsory hijab.”

She said that “it is imperative that child rights advocates and educators also engage with this matter. Nafas is, after all, a student.”

Ensaf News reported that the arrest by the police was part of the Nour Plan initiative, which started in April. Iran’s authorities have escalated physical efforts to enforce its strict hijab regulations in response to the plan, which has led to a surge in violent crackdowns targeting women on Iranian streets.

The enforcement of mandatory hijab was a significant topic in the election debates. While all presidential candidates concurred that violence is not an appropriate method for enforcing hijab regulations, it appears there has been no change in the conduct of Nour Plan officers towards women.

In July, the acting chief of police asserted that the same policies will persist under the new government. Ahmad Vahidi, the Interior Minister of the Islamic Republic, also defended the government’s mandatory hijab policy. He reported that, over the past three years, 23,000 people have been mobilized to enforce the mandatory hijab on Iranian citizens.

This latest incident also comes nearly a month before the anniversary of Mahsa Amini’s death in police custody in 2022. Amini, 22, was arrested for allegedly wearing her hijab improperly, and her death triggered months-long protests across the country, challenging the authority of the Islamic Republic.

Man charged in alleged Iran ‘murder-for-hire plot’ targeting US politicians

A Pakistani man with alleged ties to Iran has been charged in connection with a plot to assassinate US politicians and officials, potentially including former President Donald Trump.

Asif Merchant, 46, faces a charge of murder for hire after prosecutors say he paid $5,000 to an undercover FBI agent posing as a hitman.

Merchant, who frequently traveled to Iran, Syria, and Iraq and allegedly has a wife and children in Iran, reportedly discussed a complex plot targeting a political figure under heavy security. He was arrested in July and is currently being held in New York.

According to the Justice Department’s indictment, Merchant arrived in the US from Pakistan in April following a two-week stay in Iran. Upon arrival, he contacted an individual he believed could facilitate the assassination plot. This contact, however, reported Merchant to the authorities.

The indictment describes how Merchant allegedly made a “finger gun” gesture when discussing his intentions and emphasized that the operation would not be a “one-time opportunity” and would be “ongoing”, suggesting other plots may be afoot. He purportedly planned to leave the US before the targets were killed, maintaining communication through code words.

In June, the contact introduced Merchant to undercover FBI agents posing as hitmen. Merchant allegedly instructed them to steal documents from the home of a target, stage protests at political rallies, and assassinate a “political person.” The targets were to be revealed in late August or early September.

While the indictment does not specify the targets, sources have indicated that Trump was one of them. The former president, who ordered the killing of Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani in 2020, is already under increased security measures due to an Iranian plot against him, revealed in June. Iranian officials have repeatedly threatened revenge against Trump, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and former National Security Advisor John Bolton for Soleimani’s targeted killing.

FBI Director Christopher Wray described the latest scheme as a “dangerous murder-for-hire plot straight out of the Iranian playbook.” He stressed that any foreign-directed plot against a US official is a severe threat to national security and will be met with the full force of the FBI.

The plot is unrelated to a previous assassination attempt on Trump at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13, where a Secret Service sniper shot a 20-year-old assailant.

Iran’s delayed response to Haniyeh’s killing raises questions

Iran’s military retaliation against Israel for the assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran is taking longer than expected, US intelligence sources say.

While initial assessments had predicted an early attack this week, the latest information says any retaliation may now be postponed, reported Al Arabiya.

It is believed that Iran waited until after Wednesday’s meeting of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) in Jeddah before taking any action.

Iran’s Acting Foreign Minister Ali Bagheri-Kani traveled Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, leading a delegation to attend an extraordinary meeting of the Executive Committee of Foreign Ministers of the OIC. The meeting discussed the implications of the assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran last week.

Iranian acting FM Ali Bagheri Kani during OIC meeting in Jeddah, August 7, 2024.

Kani called on Muslim countries to support Iran’s right to defend itself against “acts of aggression”. Saudi Arabia supported Iran’s position, saying the assassination was a “blatant violation” of Iran’s sovereignty.

Iran has blamed Israel and the US for the killing of Haniyeh and has vowed to “avenge” his blood, however, the delay in retaliation has raised questions. White House officials said Tuesday that they believe President Joe Biden’s efforts to prevent a war in the Middle East “may be paying off” and “Iran may be reconsidering a plan for major retaliation” following the killing of the Hamas chief in Tehran, according to the Washington Post.

“The Iranian response has been complicated by seeming confusion over the circumstances of Haniyeh’s death. Tehran at first claimed he was killed by an Israeli missile, requiring a similar Iranian response. But officials say that Tehran has concluded privately that he was instead eliminated by a concealed bomb, perhaps prompting a different response,” read the article.

Tehran may also be dissuaded by the US show of force this week, and secret White House communications passed via the Swiss embassy in Tehran and the Iranian mission at the United Nations, the report said.

“Iran understands clearly that the US is unwavering in its defense of our interests, our partners and our people. We have moved a significant amount of military assets to the region to underscore that principle,” a senior administration official told The Washington Post’s David Ignatius.

 

In another development, German airline giant Lufthansa announced on Wednesday that it will avoid using Iranian and Iraqi airspace until August 13, extending its earlier decision due to high tensions in the Middle East. In addition to this, Lufthansa has extended the suspension of its services to Tel Aviv, Tehran, Beirut, Amman, and Erbil until the same date.

 

Logo of Lufthansa is seen as passengers wait at Munich Airport during a warning strike staged by Lufthansa ground staff over 9.5 % pay claim by Germany’s public sector workers union Verdi in Munich, Germany July 27, 2022.

Regional and international reactions

Egypt’s Foreign Minister Badr Abdel-Aty expressed concerns about regional stability in a phone call with Bagheri-Kani. Egypt has instructed all its aircraft to avoid Iran’s airspace for a three-hour period early Thursday, amid fears of an Iranian retaliatory strike against Israel.

The United States and Australia have denounced Iran’s destabilizing behavior, including its support for armed proxies and militant partners. US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III, along with Australian counterparts, condemned threats to shipping and freedom of navigation in the Persian Gulf, Red Sea, and Gulf of Aden, stressing the need to defend navigational rights and freedoms.

Swiss Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis also highlighted Switzerland’s dedication to prioritizing restraint during a phone call with Bagheri-Kani, emphasizing the need for moderation and diplomacy.

Israeli perspectives

Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz emphasized that the election of Yahya Sinwar as the leader of Hamas signals that the Palestinian issue is now significantly controlled by Iran and Hamas. Katz warned of the consequences of Israel withdrawing its military presence in Gaza, noting the regional threats posed by Iran. He proposed a solution of Palestinian self-management in Judea and Samaria, with Israel maintaining control over security and foreign affairs to prevent another Iranian stronghold.

Defense Minister Yoav Gallant warned Hezbollah that further escalation could lead to substantial damage to Lebanon. “As things stand, Nasrallah could lead Lebanon to pay a very, very heavy price. They can’t imagine what could happen,” he told Israeli troops. Gallant discussed threats posed by Iran and its proxies with his German counterpart Boris Pistorius, calling for global unity against Iran.

This comes as a Hezbollah commander responsible for anti-tank guided missile fire on northern Israel was killed in an air strike earlier Wednesday, according to the IDF. Hassan Fares Jeshi was killed in southern Lebanon, with Israeli fighter jets also striking Hezbollah buildings in Aitaroun.

Iran’s stance

Despite the lack of immediate action, Iranian officials continue to keep their rhetoric strong. President Masoud Pezeshkian accused Israel of inciting conflict through its “criminal and terrorist actions in Gaza and the assassination of Ismail Haniyeh” during a phone call with French President Emmanuel Macron on Wednesday. He criticized the US and Western countries for “supporting these actions instead of condemning them,” stating they have aided in “committing crimes, genocide, and terrorism.” Pezeshkian urged for a ceasefire, emphasizing that Iran is committed to peace and the defense of its interests under international law.

Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian (L) and French President Emanuel Macron (R)

Iranian army commander Abdolrahim Mousavi on Wednesday issued a warning to Israel, asserting that their actions will not go unanswered. “These crimes and assassinations by the Zionist regime will not go unanswered and will receive a definite and decisive response,” he said.

In a phone conversation with British Foreign Secretary David Lammy, Bagheri-Kani also criticized European countries for their passive stance on Haniyeh’s assassination, holding the US, UK, and France responsible for what he described as the actions of the sole “malevolent entity” in the region.